In Angie's "Team Tough or Team Pretty" post, Day Vies said this:

"Team pretty! I think it’s a side effect of being perceived of a tougher than I am because I don’t mince words. Perhaps it’s a way to offset the tough talk with a pretty exterior."

My life flashed before my eyes when I read this! I came of age in the '80s reading John Molloy's "Dress for Success" column. In Mr. Molloy's eyes, the ultimate sartorial sin was to present yourself as lacking authority. However I wasn't working at the time, I was raising children, wishing, if I'd only known to wish, that I had Angie to help me with my MOTG outfits.

Fast forward to the early 2000s, when I entered the work force. I remembered what John Molloy said and clad myself in dark pantsuits. After all, I wanted to be taken seriously! Gradually a truth dawned: getting taken seriously was not my problem, as I present as intelligent, intense, and full of rectitude. In a word, scary. So I switched to print skirts, casual sandals, and bright tees, but that only confused people.

I've spent several years now trying to find a way to dress in the workplace that conveys what I want to convey in a way that observers can understand. That conveys something like "Yes, as you already know I'm going to insist that you meet the State standards for your clinical documentation, but I'm also compassionate, open-minded, and not exactly what you might be expecting."

So I have some questions for you. First, do you consciously try to portray something with your clothes? Second, does what you're trying to portray fit easily with how you perceive yourself? Or finally, are you trying to offset either something about your own perception of yourself, or others' perceptions?

Day Vies is talking about trying to offset her bluntness with prettiness. One can hardly deny that she's got the pretty thing down and I'd love to see in person how this works!

What about you?