FashIntern - I like that idea! I used to wear fleece-lined leggings under dresses in winter. I think this kind could do as a variation to that - unless it gets too cold!
Awesome Torontogirl, thanks so much! So interesting to read
Basically I'm all for people wearing what they enjoy, and I love it when people challenge norms and expectations. For me the line for wearing leggings as pants would definitely be with regards to sheerness. If they are not see-through and in a thicker material I could definitely see them as pants at least on others.
For me part of the issue is my tummy where I feel more comfortable in pants which "draw in" the "muffin top" a bit. However, I'm annoyed at the beauty standards creating concepts like "muffin top" and meaning it as something negative. But not quite "there" yet to challenge it completely for myself in how I dress.
However, I love wearing comfortable clothes, and I like the look of skinny pants (on myself as well, regardless of what some might think "suit" my legs/hips - don't really care about that!). But, however stretchy they are, they are always a bit tight over my tummy. I enjoy wearing dresses and living in Sweden means normally needing tights under them as only a couple of months are warm enough for being bare-legged. I'm not a huge fan of hosiery as the feet often crumple up and the waist tends to slide down. Therefore I often wear leggings under dresses - either the sheer ones in hosiery style but without the feet, or thicker, non-sheer ones in cotton. Super comfy, and therefore I love the IDEA of being able to wear thick leggings as a variation to skinny pants. But, still not sure if I'd feel comfortable enough actually doing it.
Phew, that's long! And in conclusion I'd probably love the comfy of thicker leggings such as these in crushed velvet, but feel most comfortable wearing them with longer tops.
Thanks for helping me ventilate and showing me different perspectives