Lucky’s shopping awards

November 5th, 2007

Lucky magazine presented their “first annual shopping awards” in the November edition. They compared views on the best shopping destinations between the so called fashion experts and a sample of the magazines readership. The best American department stores, chain stores and websites were judged side by side and the results were very interesting.

For department stores, the industry experts shared the awards between the major department stores. Nordstrom did best and was chosen three times. Readers were more decisive, clearly picking Nordstrom and Macy’s as their favourite departments stores. Nordstrom was also on top with the readers too, but where experts thought they deserved an award for beauty, readers thought they deserved it for their selection of emerging designers. Being a loyal Nordies shopper (and given that they are going through a rough patch at the moment), this made my heart happy.

When it came to chain stores, the Lucky readership agreed with the industry’s choice of H&M for hot off the runway looks, but preferred Forever 21 for party clothes and the Gap for jeans and weekend wear. I was surprised that Gap came up as a frequent favourite, that Forever 21 was mentioned, and that Zara failed to come up at all. But it came as no surprise that the experts and Lucky readers agreed that Sephora was best for beauty products, Nine West was best for shoes and Victoria Secret was best for lingerie.

With websites, Zappos.com came up as a favourite for both the industry and Lucky readers for best shoe site; while Bluefly.com came up as a favourite for both parties as best bargains site. Nordstrom.com was a favourite on both sides for best handbag site, as was Shopbop.com for best young designers. To my surprise Lucky readers chose Gap.com for best denim site, while the experts favoured Ronherman.com and Bluebee.com for their denim.

The detailed results are below. Any surprises?

results3.jpg



3 Replies

Posted on Monday, November 5th, 2007 at 8:40 am
Maya

there are more interesting ways to do “basics” than the way gap does them. some of their stuff this season is pleasantly surprising, but i would much rather turn to michael stars or rebecca beeson for tees that are basic but still have visual interest. i find gap’s denim awful. there’s always some kind of weird whiskering going on and it just doesn’t fit me well. and all those “reverse fit” and tapered jeans?!?! uggghhh.

interesting to see how lucky’s readers differ from the fashion industry. it looks as though (surprise!) lucky readers actually take MONEY into account! i’m surprised forever 21 even made the list though, especially for party wear. i find their clothes oddly sized even for juniors, and extremely shoddy quality. i can’t imagine showing up to a party in something from there.

Posted on November 5th, 2007 at 7:49 pm

Gap has struggled with their denim fits for a while…and they use to be top notch. I do hope that they get this sorted. Forever 21’s clothing is generally shoddy and it’s hard to imagine that there was a unanimous vote from the Lucky Readership base about this store…in fact I can still scarcely believe it!

Posted on November 6th, 2007 at 8:08 am

i’m not surprised at all to see forever21 top the list for party clothes. think about it: most girls want a new outfit each time they go to a bar/club/party, and what do they wear? a tight tank top and hot jeans with heels. many women have realized you don’t have to spend a lot on a trendy, sexy little top that you’ll probably only wear a few times. besides, the clothes go through a lot (smoke filled rooms, sweat, people spilling drinks on you, haha) which is another reason to go cheap…and in the dark, who can tell?

Posted on November 7th, 2007 at 8:11 pm

Reply

You don't need to be a member to leave a reply, but if you do sign up it won't be necessary to provide your name and email address every time you do so.