I just recently became aware of an unsuspected generational divide in casual dress, and not the one I would have thought. Over the holiday weekend I was at a family wedding in Oregon. The rehearsal dinner was a barbecue in a park, and dress was said to be "shorts and jeans."
I dressed in white cropped boyfriend khakis with a TDF pale pink fluid tee. Every other woman my age was also dressed in a cute cropped pants outfit. But the young things wore dresses! Every woman under 35 was in a dress or skirt. If dress, usually short, if skirt, usually maxi. I was so surprised that there was such unanimity among the age groups about what to wear to a shorts and jeans rehearsal dinner!
Fast forward to tonight. DD mistakenly invited me to a church function. The mistake lay in her not realizing that the function was for "Young Adults aged 18-39." I arrived a bit early in white jeans, suitably styled for work. One of my better smart casual outfits, I thought. Well darn it all if the dozen young women already there weren't in cute dresses! They were casual, but not bare. Just darling summer dresses with some waist definition. The ocean wind was whipping around but of course they didn't have toppers, because they'd gotten the Angie memo that toppers don't do dresses any favors.
When did all the young things start wearing dresses for casual occasions? And when did women their mothers' age stop? Have you seen this?