I find that the brand isn't important to me, so much as the structure/type. I am a under-pronator (I've been doing PT and now have some normal pronation motion in one foot, but not really in the other-- I have some issues that stem from an old injury and some brain damage that only affects one side of my body, but that unbalances the other side).
My PT actually recommended a minimalist-type shoe with a lot of flex that allows my arches to flex as much as possible. However, my left foot isn't coming along enough for it to absorb enough shock, so I still am wearing a cushion or neutral shoe.
I also wear orthotics, and I find that running stores cannot access my gait because it is complex and I am going to add something to the shoe that changes it (and we have a world class small independent running store in my town, only the owner who has been in the business for 30 years does a good job on me). Usually I come in and tell them what I want (trail shoe, sole the same footprint of the shoe, not wider or narrower in places, amount of support in the upper, cushioning, neutral, ect) and they let me try the options-- I studied human locomotion a bit in school, so I am pretty good at gait analysis myself. They are also great there because if something doesn't perform they want to know about it, and will often replace a pair. Plus, they have an area where you can run in the shoe to get a feel. This is really important to me since I have reduced circulation and therefore try to avoid rubs/blisters, ect.
I really like a trail shoe-- even if I am running on pavement or a treadmill. I do "run light" though--- not everyone does and therefore they need the extra cushion not to beat their joints up. http://www.zappos.com/product/.....r/315276-- those are my favorite, although I also have a I pearl Zumi pair (a colorado manufacturer) that is essentially the same shoe/style, but with a bit less give in the upper.
Asics and Brooks are both really good brands.