I always hem my own jeans, but dress pants give me angst because I like a blind stitch, but I have trouble doing it nicely. After months of wearing my dress pants too long, I finally took them back to Nordstrom to be hemmed. I thought about buying a second pair right then and having them hemmed so I could wear them with flats. GOOD THING I DIDN'T!! Why, you ask? Because my original pair came back hemmed for flats. SIGH. I was there when the tailor marked them, I approved the length... so I don't know what happened. If I hike them down a bit I can wear them with the shoes I'd planned on (and wore the day I went in). It's not terrible, but it scares me from ever going to them again.
I can't afford to buy new pants when a tailor messes up. I know (or assume) that Nordstrom would replace mine if they were truly too short for me. Is that enough of a reason to continue using them? Even though they clearly mess up? Or do I risk finding another place that might ruin pants that I don't want to have to pay to replace?
(ETA: The shoes in question have a 1-1.5" heel, so it's really not that bad. Not like wearing 3" and having them hemmed for flats.)
ETA2: pics to get opinions on PPL. The new hem is at least an inch wide; does this mean they'd be able to let it out some?
1 -- worn at my "normal" waist/hip position
2-4 -- worn a little lower than I normally would; front and side views. My intent was for them to be ever longer than this, just shy of scraping the ground.
5-6 -- with flats, at my "normal" waist/hip position
7-8 -- original length, but with different shoes (old pics from Sept)
This post has 8 photos. Photos uploaded by this member are only visible to other logged in members.
If you aren't a member, but would like to participate, please consider signing up. It only takes a minute and we'd love to have you.