I wonder what his objection is. Is he not old enough to remember Unisex sizing?
Right now on a website I was looking at that makes denim "sweaters" (sweatshirts from
factory jeans fabric remnants) they only have unisex sizing
XS - small girl
S - regular girl
M - guy from brooklyn
L - guy with muscles
XL - large guy
I once attended a wedding reception in a thick charmeuse floor length, bib front, long sleeve nightgown. They used to give "tips" all the time in those years about being able
to shop in the nightgown dept. I needed a very covered up long dress for a religious
wedding, so this worked out for me at lower cost.
I just see a garment in its parts: sleeves, back, front, etc.
I wear some actual men's clothing items: I like the straightsidedness of men's jeans, pants. I have on now a grid pattern navy and grey vintage Bill Blass sweater for men.
Each square has a different dimensional textured knit in pattern, mostly a kind of tiny
birdseye thing. How is this different from the same thing in a woman's size? One of
my favorite pairs of shoes is a large boys/small mens refined oxford in mock croc patent.