I can't decide whether to laugh or throw my hands up in frustration at this point.
For one thing, I don't really subscribe to the "over 40" idea of dressing. I do keep my dressing situation-appropriate. I'm an artist and a disc jockey -- basically my life has no imposed dress code. So yeah, in theory, I could wear these to the studio, out for errands, or even to work a shift at the radio station. I can walk around and photograph in them -- something I would not do in a skirt and tights outfit. There is a slight gear vibe to them, and I'm totally fine with that. I'm a runner and a cyclist, and there are days I stay in my running pants all day long, which pretty much look like these but without the skirt.
So *shrug* there is my take on them. I'm defending them pretty strongly considering I don't even know if they're joining my wardrobe yet, but this is my rationale for considering them. Is it really so horrifying to confront the shape of 50-year-old legs? Mid-thigh shorts didn't stir up this much controversy in the summer, and those actually put my cellulite and spider veins on display, unlike these!
Anyway, on to the sweater. Laurel and Jeanie, I tried the size down (in a different color, only the S was available in the blue), and indeed an XS works much better! So I ordered it.