Shannon, I agree with your last point. I think it's important to at least try things on that others might consider "not us."
I even got a comment the other day when I wore a dress that it was not a "Suz" look. Totally fine of course -- it is how the responder viewed me (can't remember who it was) -- but it made me think, wait a minute: I can't wear a dress any more or it's not a "me" look? (The dress was classic, BTW. I think the viewer just saw me more as a "prince in pants" -- understandable given that is my uniform for work-at-home, but I have to insist, dresses ARE part of my style, too!)
I think it's one thing to say: Would this work for your lifestyle? or Would this work on your body type or is there a version that would? But to say it's not a "you" look sort of misses the point. If you're interested in it, maybe it IS a "you" look -- or part of your aspirational style, anyway. You've been showing interest in avant guard pieces for a while now. Maybe it's a direction you'd like to go.
I would like to incorporate more into my own style, too, as you know. But I haven't yet found the right pieces in the right colours. I just don't want to go all black. And I've learned that lots of draping does not feel like me; nor does it look good on me. I need to have certain specific kinds of draping and angles. So...
I wonder if you are losing some of the country/ retro/ ruggedness (it was the way you used to get your edge) and aiming more towards that urban sleek edge that would come with the addition of a few avant guard pieces to your classics. I think it's a totally do-able look -- see Amy's outfit yesterday (Anna's skirt, black t-neck, jacket, hose, booties.) I can see you or myself in a look like that in a heartbeat. It's just a question of finding the right statement pieces.