Maybe this goes back to the idea that I don't have the same ideas about what's fashion forward as a lot of others do. To me a dress and oxfords is pretty ordinary and not remarkably original. It's not a bad or boring look by any means--I wear it all the time and love it. It's not really something I do to "add edge" so to speak, though. It's just a cute, arty look that I see on a lot of cute, arty ladies.
But what do I know? I obviously have no clear ideas on what I do find edgy. I guess when I see something that really is genuinely new and ahead of the curve, that most people--meaning those interested in fashion--wouldn't think to do or wouldn't think works, and yet it does, I consider that edgy. But that can easily and quickly veer off into bad style and it's really subjective where the line exists. The denim on denim craze that took YLF by storm left me scratching my head. Yes, it was unexpected and no, most people wouldn't think to do it--but that didn't make it a good thing in my view (sorry). OTOH, as I mentioned elsehwere, I remember seeing a girl in a strong shoulder jacket long before they went mainstream, and that was edgy to me. It was daring. That's a look most women run away screaming from, and she was not only wearing it but she looked great in it. To me edgy means something that challenges common perceptions/fashion "rules", so I guess in that sense D-O-D could be considered edgy. It's just not a look I liked, nor did the words "cutting edge" ever slip into my mind when I saw it. Then again, a pear=shaped gal wearing skinnies would be considered edgy by that definition, since it challenges the rules--yet I don't find it even remotely edgy. So I'm already finding exceptions to my definition.
I guess I at least have some idea of what the agreed upon definition is, though, and that's all I was hoping to understand.