I'm sorry that I'm asking this kind of question here. But I've asked everyone I know for their opinion, I've read all the arguments for and against, and I'm not sure how I want to vote on a ballot question today. I'm asking you guys, because it is about animals and I know most of you are advocates for animals.

I'm having a hard time discerning what is truth and what is scare tactics. Ana, I especially hope you can help.

My state has one greyhound dog racing facility. There is a question on the ballot to prohibit dog racing in the state.

One side claims that dog racing is cruel and inhumane. They claim dogs are crated for 20 hrs or more a day, 800 dogs have been injured since 2002, greyhounds have died from mysterious illness and tested positive for cocaine. If these accusations are true--then of course I would vote to end it. But I find it hard to beleive that a dog could be crated in the conditions they claim for 20 hours, then be able to run at top speed. And the injury reports are not necessarily from dog racing--it did not say that anyway.

The other side denies these allegations. They say the dogs are owned by caring owners, not the tracks themselves. The state racing commission regulates the industry, vets are on duty at all times. And of course there's the whole job/economy and state revenue issue.

Personally, I would never go to a dog track. I don't like to gamble and I think it's a waste of time and money. I love animals and would never want to be part of keeping alive a tradition that harms them. However, if the animals are happy and well cared for, I always come back to the jobs and lives that will be affected.

I hope I'm not starting too heated of a debate. I'd just like some help in deciding how much is truth and how much is sensational propaganda. If this is a problem post, please let me know and I'll edit it blank.

THanks, Nicole