I have been thinking about this a bit more as I finished up my tracking for the year. A removal of worn items at the end of a season, if they have been limping along for a while, means they are not available when that season comes next time. So then a small judicious purchasing ahead can mean there is a reasonable wardrobe to start that season with, along with multi-year items. As our winter clothes start appearing say in start of March, I don't need to buy then because I have enough. As winter goes along, the stuff will start to go on sale in mid-season, so I could get something then if I had found a gap. Case in point: last winter, I had ditched my only warm loose cardigan in winter 2017 as it was a 2008(?) purchase which was getting a bit worn plus was not all that flattering I felt, having learned more since 2008- it sort of went straight up and down hiding any shape I have. I had other things like jumpers and jackets and thin layering merinos. But I did miss a warm cozy cardigan. So when I saw the lovely bronze one in August at half price, I pounced. And I wore it 37 times from then until early December on the cooler Spring days. That has made the $95 cost ( rather than the full price $190) so reasonable.
This strategy does mean you won't get the new stuff at the start of a season that really sings to you. But the point is, you still could. And I also find that as an eclectic dresser a lot sings to me, far more than I could actually either afford or get a chance to wear. Sometimes it might not sing so much in a few weeks or months. So it might be better sitting on a Wishlist on a site rather than in my closet. And if it still sings in a few months, and my size is there which it may well be, then bonus it may be on sale by then.
I know my strategy would not work for Angie who is an unusually small size. But I am a common size ( NZ/Aus size 14 which is US 10 I believe) so often they make plenty in my size. I'm only a small size for shoes.