Sorry for not getting back sooner, but I got up a bit earlier this morning so I’d have a bit of quiet time to respond to all of you. Thanks for all the support—and for finding out that I’m not the only one who is redefining the role that YLF and fashion is playing in her life.
First let me say unequivocally that I don’t think that a small wardrobe works for every woman. Same goes for a restricted colour palette—it works for ME, but certainly wouldn’t satisfy everyone. I think sometimes it’s too easy to give off the implication that small is better, or that monotone is more stylish, or quality trumps quantity—in short, that some choices are better than others. It took severe downsizing to make me realize that I really am happier with fewer choices at this stage of my life, but I suspect that my feelings about this are as much due to age and lifestyle as to any personal philosophy.
I so appreciate all your comments; there are a couple of comments, though, that I’d like to respond to in a bit more depth, if that is OK.
Thimblelina: It was Ummila’s post about fashion creatives that made me want to put down some of my thoughts. I originally was going to reply on her thread, but decided that it might be better to start my own. And you, Amyjo, Gryffin, Gradfashionista, Susie and Thistle make me feel I’m not alone in thinking that making a distinction between acquiring and admiring might be a reasonable way to indulge my interest in fashion and participate in a fashion forum. Some of us need, and love, both, but I think equating the two might be one of the reasons that people leave forums like YLF. That seems a shame since Angie has never been one to encourage overconsumption. I also like your emphasis that real-life fashion ought to be about POV and retention, not acquisition and commerce. Wise words!
Unfrumped: You’ve astutely hit on exactly what has happened to me over the past couple of years. Honestly, I don’t know if it’s possible to know what will fit your future needs—which kind of puts a big dent into the idea of “investment” dressing. I suspect that following your heart is probably as good a guide as any; I know that the pieces that I couldn’t bear to part with are now in regular rotation because I now consider them everyday wear. If they get dirty, they get cleaned; if torn, mended—having a tiny closet means wearing everything constantly. Quality pieces do stand up better to this treatment, and I’m much more apt to consider cleaning as part of the cost of owning a piece. A bargain piece isn’t a bargain if I can’t wash it or have to worry about getting a spot on it.
Beth Ann: I’ve really been trying to avoid too much duplication. It really seems true that one colour gets worn more than another, and I suspect that I’d get bored more easily if all my tops were more or less the same shape. Finding a new style is more work, but, ultimately, seems more satisfying because I get to choose between a woven shirt, a V-neck sweater, or a polo neck—to say nothing of possible combinations. But Elly’s example is exactly what I was trying to say earlier; lifestyle, work, and age play a huge part in determining what constitutes a reasonable size wardrobe. I know that when I was working, I could never have reduced my wardrobe to half a dozen tops—duplication was a necessity, not an indulgence!
Rabbit: Ticking several boxes with one piece is a good way of putting it. It’s harder and takes more time and effort, but I keep thinking isn’t that what a hobby ought to be? And I’d never feel I needed to OWN every book or painting that intrigued me or grabbed my attention.
Suz: It’s strange how much more I enjoy getting dressed now that I don’t think of “holes” or “needs”. I just wear what I have—anything else is a “want”. I think it works because I’ve culled to only the items that flatter me and make me feel like me when I wear them. Actually that ended up being my litmus test when I sorted through my previous closet. If something made me feel good about myself and my body, it stayed; if I had to pause to think about it, off it went. Oddly, when I looked at what I kept using that method, everything more or less flowed together almost seamlessly at the end. I’m sure logical analysis and quantifying work well for some people, but obviously those methods ended up being less than helpful for me when it came to wardrobe building. Maybe it’s just too easy for me to turn a “want” into a “hole” and then a “need”? I’m pretty good at rationalizations.
CC: Yes, the outdoor gear was actually harder to cull than skirts and shirts because much of it was bought for specific situations and purposes—and the connotations and emotional ties were much harder to ignore. I tried to be realistic about what activities were likely to be part of my future and to give the nod to things that could be worn for more than one activity. I also realized that I didn’t need to be so specialized—I’m wearing cashmere on ski slopes!
Rachylou: thanks—and you know that I love anything that you say on this forum! You make me laugh more than anyone else I’ve ever met. And Bettycrocker—can I say how much I giggle at that image of the perfect 60s housewife that pops into my head when I read your name! And thanks for the words of support, kkards, abc, and jackiec-- they mean a lot to me.
Deb and Caro: Both of you have been such an inspiration to me because I know both of you have chosen to work with a small wardrobe and limited palette. And Dorothy Parker hits the target with that quote!
Laura, Lyn D., Kiwigal, Amiable, Shevia, Carla, Una, Elly, Adelfa, Susie, Meredith, Tania, Dimity, Suz: Isn’t it interesting how we all need to figure out for ourselves what is “right” for our lives and closets—and how helpful it is to watch others work through the process. I know I’ve learned so much from all of you. That’s why it makes me sad to see members leave the forum because they wanted to restrict their purchasing. Everyone has to do what is right for her, but it still leaves a hole.
I’m also so glad that many of you support my feelings that YLF isn’t just about acquiring more stuff, but, instead, is a welcoming place for all of us to play around with fashion—even if some of us are just wanting to window shop for a while.