Cardiff girl, sorry too.
The problem with long threads and sporadic posting over the course of several years is that continuity for complex information is hard to manage.... This whole conversation stemmed from my asking Suz about acceptable risk of blistering when purchasing new shoes. If you had read a few of my previous posts relating to feet and knees, you’d have noticed my discussion about having Rheumatoid feet and the correspondingly extremely small range of footwear which doesn’t aggravate this condition. I can wear without joint or soft tissue pain maybe 1/5000 shoes which are manufactured and available in the USA. Typically, the foot pain which concerns me is arthritis, tendinitis, several varieties of neuropathy or plantar fasciitis.
At the moment, mercifully my immune system isn’t aggressively attacking my feet, and the damage I’m left with strongly resembles osteoarthritis.
Thus, seemingly shoes which create some blistering would be an acceptable price for not aggravating the arthritis. However, unfortunately one of the corresponding symptoms of RA and/or the drugs used to treat RA is the tendency for frequent infections. I’ve had to get treatment for foot infection related to my weird toenail growth pattern at a frequency of more times than I can readily count.
So the deep question for Suz was more about how long is it reasonable to tolerate a brief period of infection risk while starting wearing shoes which miraculously don’t aggravate the arthritis. I think that her idea of preemptive bandaid use might be just the ticket with the particular sandals prompting this conversation.
I’ve never needed to preemptively bandaid because on top of everything else, my feet are so low volume and narrow, that they make minimal contact with most forefoot straps which I can tolerate on account of the RA. So I’m not actually accustomed to blistering, in spite of my litany of other issues.