So I got the Clarks Hamble Oak in a wide fit! I had to get them in black because they are for work (retail, all-black uniform), but I've been told I can get away with patent if I want to, as long as it's dressy and black (there are girls wearing keds and buckled booties, but whatever). I would like to wear the shoes outside work, too, especially since I'm hoping I'll find more suitable for me job soon.
So, I gravitate towards patent stuff. I just do, I guess I like the shine. But I wonder which of the two pairs is going to be more practical (get less scratched, be more durable, lower maintenance) and which one is going to be more versatile.
My experience with patent shoes so far is only with court shoes and ballet flat, but I have the feeling they would look better with lighter jeans and pants than plain leather would. Is that correct? Please enlighten me!
Yes, I bought both pairs because I'm (indecisive) cool like that, but I can only keep one, because even cool people like me are broke sometimes.
http://www.sarenza.pl/clarks-h.....0000045682
http://www.clarks.co.uk/p/20346713
YAY: Patent
NAY: Leather
This post has 1 photo. Photos uploaded by this member are only visible to other logged in members.
If you aren't a member, but would like to participate, please consider signing up. It only takes a minute and we'd love to have you.