Hmm, I've never seen an unclothed mannequin that even remotely resembled an actual human being so I'm having trouble seeing the point of this article.
Is the writer advocating that every company ought to supply a unique mannequin that will fit a specific size in that company's clothing? If a retail outlet carried several lines, how would that work? I'm hoping that the author is not arguing for the reverse; if a company's actual clothes are to be re-worked and shaped so they are a better fit on the mannequins I currently see in the stores, I'm in big trouble!
