Sal I like your em-dashes in lieu of periods -- you are posting Emily Dickinson-style! (I never met an em-dash I didn't like, anyhow.) Aha, that makes sense about men's jeans, they do seem to have less up and down with rise trends, don't they? Agree that it might be an easier strategy for someone taller, but for me, maybe the boys' department?
Runcarla that sounds like such a great jeans shopping strategy! I think something similar would work well for me too -- both in terms of my fit challenges and my general wardrobe/shopping approach. I am taking notes!
Angie, thanks for passing along all these possibilities you are noticing! For me what counts as "low rise" depends on the cut of the pant -- basically the tighter/skinnier the pant, the lower the rise must be. For those fluid, straight-leg jeans like the Everlane model, my sweet spot is about 8". 9 1/4" would be high rise on me, alas. I suppose I will have better luck once low rises are firmly established and "ultra low rise" becomes a fringe trend, haha!
Slim cat I suspect I also need to do a more thorough hunt in-store. Do keep me updated on what you find out!