I was having a conversation with DH about the leather jackets that I have been ordering and returning and he asked me whether the stores will come after me for buying and returning things. I was surprised but then remembered that a few years ago retail stores were really cracking down on habitual returners, even banning them from shopping. I have read that lately they have reversed these policies because they were hurting the sales and driving away customers.

I am curious about what effect habitual returners have on the retailers' bottom line (vs. the effect of the extra sales driven by generous return policies). I know that if it was not for Nordstrom's return policy, I would not shop there at all since we have no Nordstrom retail stores within driving distance. As it is, I have directed most of my clothing budget to Nordstrom, and the free shipping/returns+no questions asked return policy is the driver. Reminds me of how we usually buy outdoor gear from LLBean because of their unconditional guarantee.

On the other hand, I think many people believe that habitual returners hurt retailers and that it is somehow "unfair" to buy things with a fairly clear intention of "trying and returning". I will say that I almost never return things that have been worn but even so, I have been burned a few times by situation where clothing shrunk after the first wash and could no longer be returned to places like the Loft. Again, for that reason I am more likely to purchase from Nordstrom or even Brooks Brothers if I am not sure whether something might shrink (both have unconditional return policy).

I have totally switched to "buy, try on at home, take photos, return if not perfect" mode of shopping rather than "buy if it looks good in the store, keep no matter what" mode.

What do you think?