Consumers in North America regard returns, especially from online stores, as standard business practice. As long as the item is in its original packaging, or has tags attached, it will usually go straight back out in the next order, unless there are obvious signs of damage. Damaged, or outdated merchandise, is usually sold at a discount
It ticks me off, though, when consumers aren't careful with the merchandise--in stores as well as at home. Throwing stuff in heap on the floor of a dressing room is as bad as doing it in your home, except the stuff in a home can sit there a lot longer--with maybe a cat using it for an occasional nap or two. Wearing a too-small item around the house for several hours " to see if it will stretch out" also bugs me, especially if the still-tagged item ends up being shipped out to me after the item ihas been returned. I once ordered the same sweater in two colors, at full price, from Nordstrom's-- one fit well, while the second had been so horribly stretched over the bust it looked like a rag. As I don't get free shipping in Canada, I had to pay for return shipping to get a duty refund and then ask Nordstom to refund the shipping costs. Not an easy task, and it soured me on Nordstrom's no-questions-asked return policy for quite some time.
I guess I'd like to think that everyone treats a merchandiser's clothing with care and respect while making the decision to buy. It's nice to have liberal return policies so I can try things on in my own home, but I think some people have some misguided ideas about what a trial period is all about.
Whew--that was a rant and a half--but it is one of the reasons why I'm reluctant to shop online with any company that promises no-questions-asked returns.