Angie's not here so I will throw in my two cents and then when she gets back I'll get a wet noodle (a gently, graciously applied wet noodle, LOL).
I would wear this in a heart beat, and not have any qualms. Yes, I do like a more floor-skimming length, BUT, with a suit like this, it's silly, because the hem will drag in the dirt and quickly become disgusting.
Because it's not a wide leg or bootcut, I think a shorter length can work okay. If it were flared or wide, I would be saying differently. But, it's not.
I think the length in the back is perfect - considering the light color of the suit. This won't drag on the ground. The length in the front seems a tad higher than in the back (as is often the case with hems.. when mass mfr'd they make them even all around, but few of us are equally distributed front vs rear). The ideal in front is that you have a bit of a break about an inch above the hem. I suspect you have some hem there to work with - an inch? If so, I think this is salvageable. I would have your tailor keep the back as is but make the front a tiny bit longer, by taking the hem out just maybe a 1/2 inch? So it won't be even front to back - it will be uneven. But I think the effect might work okay.
It might be simply how you are standing in the pic, but in the back view pic it seems like your right leg is longer than your left, because the hems hit differently there too. This is VERY common (it's the case with me too). It's particularly common with women, because we cross our legs all day long, which leads to acquired leg length discrepancies. So even if this was PPL, you'd *still* have to take it to the tailor. (Or do lots of yoga stretches to undo the effects of leg-crossing).
