<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: Vogue, Lena Dunham, and Photoshop</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/vogue-lena-dunham-and-photoshop</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 07:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/vogue-lena-dunham-and-photoshop" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>Emily on "Vogue, Lena Dunham, and Photoshop"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/vogue-lena-dunham-and-photoshop#post-1144391</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1144391@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Lena Dunham is practically a holy icon to Jezebel. &#038;nbsp;Their overreaction does not surprise me. &#038;nbsp;(...it is still an overreaction)
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>viva on "Vogue, Lena Dunham, and Photoshop"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/vogue-lena-dunham-and-photoshop#post-1144348</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>viva</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1144348@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I agree: much ado about nothing. Jezebel surely can find better things to raise hell about. 
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>April on "Vogue, Lena Dunham, and Photoshop"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/vogue-lena-dunham-and-photoshop#post-1144342</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>April</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1144342@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I didn't read the whole piece, but looking at that first &#034;before and after&#034; photo, it just looks like they fixed the fit of the dress rather than changing anything about Lena herself. &#038;nbsp;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Tailoring takes time, Photoshop is quick. &#038;nbsp;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Janet on "Vogue, Lena Dunham, and Photoshop"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/vogue-lena-dunham-and-photoshop#post-1144331</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Janet</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1144331@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I am really critical when it comes to Photoshop work -- after all, I did a heck of a lot of it myself for years and years (I barely use it on my own work) -- but I must admit, I found the Lena Dunham shopping job pretty darn tame. I agree with you, she is still recognizable, which I can't say of a lot of stars once their photo makes the cover of a magazine. I love it when all of a sudden their waists are the same circumference as their heads, and their hands have absolutely no creases on them and look like they're made of plastic.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;But don't get me started on the people who say that you should NEVER use Photoshop and you're a crap photographer if you do. That is BS.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>ironkurtin on "Vogue, Lena Dunham, and Photoshop"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/vogue-lena-dunham-and-photoshop#post-1144310</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>ironkurtin</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1144310@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;&#060;a href=&#034;http://jezebel.com/here-are-the-unretouched-images-from-lena-dunhams-vogu-1503336657&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;http://jezebel.com/here-are-th.....1503336657&#060;/a&#062;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Jezebel is taking heat for this, as seen here:&#060;br /&#062;&#060;a href=&#034;http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/20/business/media/debate-on-photo-retouching-flares-online-with-roles-reversed.html?hp&#038;amp;_r=0&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01.....with-roles&#060;/a&#062;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Apparently the controversy is that Jezebel is picking a fight when there's no fight.&#038;nbsp; Photoshop to Lena is minimal. Although honestly if you look at what they did, the fact it really did strike me as sensitive and directed tells you a lot about how we judge photo alterations and our bodies. Lena still looks real - just better.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	