https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/there-is-still-something-i-dont-get-about-that-glamour-article Style Advice for Fashion Lovers en-US Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:14:20 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/there-is-still-something-i-dont-get-about-that-glamour-article#post-414696 Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:44:30 +0000 DressLover 414696@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>I don't know much about Glamour, but whenever I see it on display I find it odd they use that annoying IMPACT font. You think they'd pick a more, you know, glamorous font. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/there-is-still-something-i-dont-get-about-that-glamour-article#post-414690 Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:39:50 +0000 Scarlet 414690@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>Ahhh, okay, I was confused. I think I have bought a total of 1 Glamour in my life and now I am sorry about it. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/there-is-still-something-i-dont-get-about-that-glamour-article#post-414688 Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:37:54 +0000 RoseandJoan 414688@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>I believe Yahoo featured the Glamour article but shortened it in the process, Anna linked to the Yahoo article but if you click from there to the Glamour site all of the slide show is present (or at least that is my understanding of it). </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/there-is-still-something-i-dont-get-about-that-glamour-article#post-414687 Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:36:25 +0000 DressLover 414687@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>A condensed version of the "article" was produced for Yahoo in slideshow form. Luckily, Angie wasn't in it. She was only included in the full version on the Glamour website. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/there-is-still-something-i-dont-get-about-that-glamour-article#post-414684 Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:34:21 +0000 Scarlet 414684@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>Am I missing something here? Am I slow and everyone gets this already? I know that Anna posted a thread recently referring to an inane article about denim. Thread is here:<br /> <a href="http://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/most-inane-article-about-denim-ever" rel="nofollow">http://youlookfab.com/welookfa.....denim-ever</a></p> <p>It was that brilliant Glamour article referred to in Angie's "Grain of Salt" post. I read it at the time and completely agreed that it was a worthless article. But at that time there was no Angie in it. I think they added Angie to the article possibly because of the traffic Anna's thread generated? Is this how the internet works? Am I bananas? </p>