<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: Style descriptors for me?</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/style-descriptors-for-me</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 08:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/style-descriptors-for-me" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>Astrid on "Style descriptors for me?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/style-descriptors-for-me#post-1203965</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Astrid</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1203965@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Thanks Viva. I think I just might go with &#060;i&#062;simple&#060;/i&#062;, Joy makes a good point here.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Joy, I totally agree. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Diane, I don't think those two negate each other. I would say &#060;i&#062;feminine&#060;/i&#062; plays an important part, but I do have my Tomboy influences too (like my watch for example). I was a tomboy during my teens and sometimes I like to take that up again. I think it was E who mentioned the concept of&#060;i&#062; Girly Tomboy &#060;/i&#062;a while ago.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Thanks Rachylou! How about &#060;i&#062;reasonable&#060;/i&#062; instead of &#060;i&#062;appropriate&#060;/i&#062;? Or &#060;i&#062;befitting&#060;/i&#062;, but that's also repressive.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Thanks Susie! I'm not sure. I wouldn't say &#060;i&#062;minimal&#060;/i&#062; fits and &#060;i&#062;relaxed&#060;/i&#062; is kind of a part of &#060;i&#062;grounded&#060;/i&#062; for me. &#060;i&#062;Uncomplicated&#060;/i&#062; fits, but I think &#060;i&#062;simple&#060;/i&#062; encompasses more of the terms I want to express.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Rabbit, you summed it up perfectly! Much better than I could. Thank you.  <span aria-hidden="true" class="emoticon emoticon-smile icon-emoticon-smile "></span> 
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>rabbit on "Style descriptors for me?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/style-descriptors-for-me#post-1203906</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rabbit</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1203906@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I think with these words I kind of only want to add ones that I need to remind myself of. &#038;nbsp;So I can say 'Graceful' and for myself that partly evokes minimalism and a limited color palette, but those things are so taken for granted in my wardrobe that I don't need a separate word to remind me, if that makes sense  <span aria-hidden="true" class="emoticon emoticon-smile icon-emoticon-smile "></span>  &#038;nbsp; &#038;nbsp;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;That's why I can see your word 'simple' working for you without having to unpack it into 'relaxed, uncomplicated, minimal'.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>rabbit on "Style descriptors for me?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/style-descriptors-for-me#post-1203902</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rabbit</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1203902@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Actually I think these fit you&#038;nbsp;perfectly. &#038;nbsp;I think I also have the same connotations for the words as you do. &#038;nbsp;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I also think they might point particularly to different aspects of the clothes - so &#060;b&#062;simple &#060;/b&#062;might be&#038;nbsp;most useful when looking at tailoring (cut, buttons, lines are direct and unfussy). &#038;nbsp;&#060;b&#062;Grounded&#060;/b&#062; - in my mind references fabrics, care instructions, and tends to refer to items that contact the elements, outerwear and shoes, as well as the practicality and usability in your life. &#038;nbsp;Tomboyish also fits here for me because it usually refers to clothes that are androgynous because of their across the board utility. &#038;nbsp;&#060;b&#062;Feminine&#060;/b&#062; - this is the what looks and feels flattering on you rubric.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Or that's what is evoked in my head at least.  <span aria-hidden="true" class="emoticon emoticon-smile icon-emoticon-smile "></span> 
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Susie on "Style descriptors for me?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/style-descriptors-for-me#post-1203892</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Susie</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1203892@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I think simple works but if you are looking for an alternative...along similar lines I used all three of these in my list of adjectives- relaxed, uncomplicated, minimal. They are similar yet I saw enough differences to use all of them. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Would one of them work better than simple?
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>rachylou on "Style descriptors for me?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/style-descriptors-for-me#post-1203882</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rachylou</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1203882@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;These words together make a lot of sense to me, and I see them in you, Astrid.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;i&#062;Schlict &#060;/i&#062;btw is a good word, fitting.&#038;nbsp; I might say &#034;without question&#034; or &#034;sober&#034;, which isn't quite right I know. I myself am looking for an alternative for &#034;appropriate&#034;... something not so repressive (!)&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Anonymous on "Style descriptors for me?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/style-descriptors-for-me#post-1203790</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1203790@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I think Simple works as you describe it and&#038;nbsp;the opposite of cluttered.&#038;nbsp; Except for scarves, I don't think of you as wearing lots of accessories.&#038;nbsp; Even patterned pieces can have simple lines and no extra ornamentation.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Anonymous on "Style descriptors for me?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/style-descriptors-for-me#post-1203787</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1203787@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Hmmm, I have to admit to being confused as under the heading of Grounded you mention tomboy and yet&#038;nbsp;you have a main&#038;nbsp;heading of feminine, which is in&#038;nbsp; my book, the exact opposite.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>viva on "Style descriptors for me?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/style-descriptors-for-me#post-1203784</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>viva</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1203784@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;In my terms I used &#034;unfussy&#034;? Maybe something more like that?&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Astrid on "Style descriptors for me?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/style-descriptors-for-me#post-1203772</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Astrid</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1203772@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Thanks Catnip! Maybe my view on what the term simple means is wrong, but to me prints don't exclude a look from being simple. I'm not sure what would be a better term, what I'm thinking about is simple in the meaning of&#060;i&#062; schlicht&#060;/i&#062;. Although you might be right because searching for &#060;i&#062;schlicht&#060;/i&#062; on Pinterest turns up a sea of solids. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;a href=&#034;http://www.pinterest.com/pin/93942342197260618/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;http://www.pinterest.com/pin/93942342197260618/&#060;/a&#062;&#060;/p&#062;

&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Catnip on "Style descriptors for me?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/style-descriptors-for-me#post-1203762</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Catnip</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1203762@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Astrid, I'm not sure I think &#034;simple&#034; describes your look.&#038;nbsp; If I recall correctly, you wear quite a few prints.&#038;nbsp; Somehow I don't think prints are simple.&#038;nbsp; But of course I could be wrong.&#038;nbsp; I like the other two descriptors.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Astrid on "Style descriptors for me?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/style-descriptors-for-me#post-1203750</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Astrid</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1203750@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I thought about my style descriptors yesterday and posted my thoughts on Sharon's thread. I didn't have a style statement that resonated with me for a while and I wanted to give the style descriptors another try. Here's what I came up with:
&#060;p&#062;&#060;b&#062;Simple:&#060;/b&#062;&#060;br /&#062;No frills. Unpretentious. Uncluttered. Pared down.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;b&#062;Grounded:&#060;/b&#062;&#060;br /&#062;Practical. Laid-back. Rustic. Comfortable. Tomboyish. Natural.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;b&#062;Feminine:&#060;/b&#062;&#060;br /&#062;Soft. Composed. Colorful. Harmonious. Intuitive. Chic.&#060;/p&#062;
Do you think these descriptors fit? Would you add more? Does any of the terms mentioned deserve a rubric of their own? &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I'd love to hear your thoughts. :)&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	