<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: Structured volume over volume?</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/structured-volume-over-volume</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/structured-volume-over-volume" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>Elizabeth P on "Structured volume over volume?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/structured-volume-over-volume#post-1583734</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 23:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Elizabeth P</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1583734@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Makes total sense to me too. When a knit is heavier, it seems to settle down/reign in the volume it's going over, somehow.&#038;nbsp; Esp as this one seems more cropped.&#038;nbsp; Pretty!
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Diana on "Structured volume over volume?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/structured-volume-over-volume#post-1583721</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1583721@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Yup, this makes perfect sense. It's what I do a lot of the time too, particularly with the tops. Those t-shaped or drop shoulder tops are usually terrible on me too (unless they have very short sleeves, so more like a tank with extended straps) as they make my shoulders look super round and droopy. Plus the neckline tends to drift backward and choke me due to my poor posture. A structured shoulder seam (preferably a set-in sleeve, which follows the shoulder line closely) provides a squarer stronger shoulder line, and the structure prevents some of the neckline drift.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>unfrumped on "Structured volume over volume?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/structured-volume-over-volume#post-1583717</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>unfrumped</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1583717@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I have been enjoying this boxy mauvy-blush sweater due to its being a heavy cotton knit so it's not moth-bait, and it can be worn in several seasons--cotton is comfortable and then can be layered under. Mostly have worn it with pencil skirts.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;With my flowy high-volume pants and culottes, I have to watch out for putting volume over volume, but sometimes I want to try something boxy or not tucked.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I'm thinking this sweater can work with the wide trousers because though it's not slim-fitted, something about the high neck and the thick knit make it more structured than loose and flowy.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I have had trouble with a lot of typical square boxy&#038;nbsp; tops in woven or scuba fabrics (BR had a lot of fun such tops--you know without shoulder seams but cut like&#038;nbsp; a &#034;T&#034; shape ) because something about my shape or posture (or, &#034;it's the clothes! ') makes them stick out in front like a babydoll top. But this knit lies better while still being a little boxy.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;It's not quite as short as may be ideal, but with the pants' lower rise I need the length, and too-cropped things are dicey at work.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Do not have a pic now, but is there some sense in that analysis for combining big over big?
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	