https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sciencefashion-fail Style Advice for Fashion Lovers en-US Mon, 27 Apr 2026 11:37:40 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sciencefashion-fail#post-399190 Sat, 06 Aug 2011 08:43:00 +0000 Sharon 399190@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>Maybe this is the marketing departments interpretation of "carbon neutral". </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sciencefashion-fail#post-398832 Fri, 05 Aug 2011 21:27:18 +0000 rae 398832@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>Whoops!</p> <p>Or... maybe it was an "artistic choice"? o_0 </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sciencefashion-fail#post-398695 Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:02:12 +0000 Aziraphale 398695@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>HAHAHAHA!! Awesome. As an ex-science teacher, I would actually have noticed that. I suppose it doesn't really matter, though; we get the idea. Or should it matter? I'm not sure.</p> <p>I've got a physicist friend who can't watch science fiction films because all the glaring mistakes the filmmakers invariably make give him apoplectic fits. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sciencefashion-fail#post-398694 Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:01:56 +0000 lyn* 398694@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>HAHAHAHA. Oh dear; maybe the whole big thing wouldn't fit in their backdrop? :p </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sciencefashion-fail#post-398690 Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:56:50 +0000 annagybe 398690@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>Don't need no stinking carbon and nitrogen.</p> <p><a href="http://jezebel.com/5827800/j-crew-gets-the-periodic-table-wrong" rel="nofollow">http://jezebel.com/5827800/j-c.....able-wrong</a> </p>