<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: Sack dresses vs. oversized sweaters</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sack-dresses-vs-oversized-sweaters</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/sack-dresses-vs-oversized-sweaters" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>Kristen on "Sack dresses vs. oversized sweaters"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sack-dresses-vs-oversized-sweaters#post-77041</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Kristen</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">77041@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I would guess shift = more of a column look, and sack = more volume., especially at the bottom. But I am curious about the official explanation!&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;(P.S. Angie, I think I saw your pretty yellow-and-grey sack dress at AT. Was that it? It looked very much like you!)
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>marianne on "Sack dresses vs. oversized sweaters"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sack-dresses-vs-oversized-sweaters#post-77023</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>marianne</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">77023@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Hmm I've seen shift and sack used interchangeably, though I think that shift is basically straight up and down, and sack is more voluminous and loose.&#060;br /&#062;
There are a couple of fall sack dresses on Max Studio site that I've been eyeing, but they are all black or grey, and I feel like I need to branch out  <span aria-hidden="true" class="emoticon emoticon-smile icon-emoticon-smile "></span> 
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Laura on "Sack dresses vs. oversized sweaters"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sack-dresses-vs-oversized-sweaters#post-77011</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">77011@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;My guess would be that a shift dress has more structure and is more fitted and a sack dress is more loose in structure. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Obviously, I am not the expert!
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Patience on "Sack dresses vs. oversized sweaters"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sack-dresses-vs-oversized-sweaters#post-77010</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Patience</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">77010@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Out of curiosity, what's the difference between a sack dress and a shift dress?
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Laura on "Sack dresses vs. oversized sweaters"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sack-dresses-vs-oversized-sweaters#post-77004</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">77004@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Oh really? That Max Studio dress qualifies as a sack dress? DUH. Thanks everyone for setting me straight (and good thing Kristen &#038;#38; I are going to have each other's backs at the NAS pre-sale tonight!!).
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Angie on "Sack dresses vs. oversized sweaters"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sack-dresses-vs-oversized-sweaters#post-76904</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">76904@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;That's a jumper (a sweater) - not a dress. I like sack dresses unbelted too. In fact, I LOVE them. I think it’s liberating to wear a tasteful muumuu and still look and feel fabulous. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Your new Max Studio dress is a sack dress, Laura.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Maya on "Sack dresses vs. oversized sweaters"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sack-dresses-vs-oversized-sweaters#post-76873</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Maya</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">76873@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I have never liked belts on me, Khris. I can wear thin ones, but they are too uncomfortable for me to leave on all day. I always end up taking them off within a few hours. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I like them on other people though. BUT, with sack dresses, I prefer them to just be sack dresses...not &#034;reined in&#034;...even if you do have a waist.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>chewyspaghetti on "Sack dresses vs. oversized sweaters"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sack-dresses-vs-oversized-sweaters#post-76866</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>chewyspaghetti</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">76866@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I agree with Maya on this dress.&#060;br /&#062;
You can spell is 'saque' if it makes you feel any better LOL&#060;br /&#062;
I'm actually loving the look right now. Look for something that fits in the shoulder and drops straight down, or in sleeveless versions go straight down from the underarm.&#060;br /&#062;
I think the unbelted versions look particularly good on us apple shapes, Maya. It gives the illusion that under there is a slimmer waist, which may not actually be the case.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Maya on "Sack dresses vs. oversized sweaters"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sack-dresses-vs-oversized-sweaters#post-76838</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Maya</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">76838@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Also, here is the original blog post:&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;a href=&#034;http://youlookfab.com/2007/06/20/rein-in-the-sack-dress/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;http://youlookfab.com/2007/06/.....ack-dress/&#060;/a&#062;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Personally I don't mind them unbelted at all, and actually prefer them that way...but to each her own.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Maya on "Sack dresses vs. oversized sweaters"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sack-dresses-vs-oversized-sweaters#post-76837</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Maya</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">76837@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I don't really see that as a sack dress. The length, material, and style just make it look like a sweater to me. It's a tunic and not a dress. The banded bottom also leaves me cold, and adds to the tunic/top vibe. I would not think to wear it as a dress. Are you looking for something to wear as a dress, or over jeans?&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;These are sack dresses to me:&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;a href=&#034;http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/3055325/0~2376776~2374327~2374331~6014194?mediumthumbnail=Y&#038;#038;origin=category&#038;#038;searchtype=&#038;#038;pbo=6014194&#038;#038;P=1&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/30.....4&#038;#038;P=1&#060;/a&#062;&#060;br /&#062;
&#060;a href=&#034;http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/3026933/0~2376776~2374327~2374331~6014194?mediumthumbnail=Y&#038;#038;origin=category&#038;#038;searchtype=&#038;#038;pbo=6014194&#038;#038;P=1&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/30.....4&#038;#038;P=1&#060;/a&#062;&#060;br /&#062;
&#060;a href=&#034;http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/3038356/0~2376776~2374327~2374331~6014194?mediumthumbnail=Y&#038;#038;origin=category&#038;#038;searchtype=&#038;#038;pbo=6014194&#038;#038;P=2&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/30.....4&#038;#038;P=2&#060;/a&#062;&#060;br /&#062;
&#060;a href=&#034;http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/3036711/0~2376776~2374327~2374331~6014194?mediumthumbnail=Y&#038;#038;origin=category&#038;#038;searchtype=&#038;#038;pbo=6014194&#038;#038;P=2&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/30.....4&#038;#038;P=2&#060;/a&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Laura on "Sack dresses vs. oversized sweaters"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/sack-dresses-vs-oversized-sweaters#post-76834</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">76834@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Sack dress -- That's such a lovely term isn't it? Rolls right off the tongue.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Anyway! A sack dress or two are tops on my list for fall. I just rec'd the new Victoria's Secret catalog with a fall preview, and in addition to seeing those new loose, pleated, tapered pants that Angie blogged about, they had this:&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;a href=&#034;http://www2.victoriassecret.com/commerce/onlineProductDisplay.vs?namespace=productDisplay&#038;#038;origin=onlineProductDisplay.jsp&#038;#038;event=display&#038;#038;prnbr=CU-248586&#038;#038;cgname=OSKEYCLOZZZ&#038;#038;rfnbr=220&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;http://www2.victoriassecret.co.....;rfnbr=220&#060;/a&#062;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Does this qualify as a sack dress? I am not in love with this version, I'd like something a little more refined, but I want to make sure I know what to look for.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	