<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: Proportions experiment
ETA: tucked top pics added</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/proportions-experiment-1</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 15:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/proportions-experiment-1" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>Truecolors on "Proportions experiment
ETA: tucked top pics added"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/proportions-experiment-1#post-1334210</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Truecolors</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1334210@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I prefer the looks: 4,6,7,9, and 11. Here's why:&#060;br /&#062;- shows off your figure&#060;br /&#062;- the proportions are more flattering&#060;br /&#062;- when your top is loose, wearing slim or structured bottoms looks more put-together
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>N-Marie on "Proportions experiment
ETA: tucked top pics added"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/proportions-experiment-1#post-1334178</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>N-Marie</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1334178@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Thanks Suz! Yes, it's the Pleione top (Angie's pick). It looks a bit red in the pic above but the color is rendered more accurately in Suz's pic above and&#038;nbsp;in my previous post:&#060;br /&#062;&#060;a rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; href=&#034;http://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/wiw-new-nas-pleione-top&#034;&#062;http://youlookfab.com/welookfa.....leione-top&#060;/a&#062;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#038;nbsp;It's a really versatile piece and super comfy to wear as well! I wish they had the &#034;moroccan teal&#034;&#038;nbsp;color in my size because I would buy that one in a heartbeat too.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Suz on "Proportions experiment
ETA: tucked top pics added"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/proportions-experiment-1#post-1333959</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Suz</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1333959@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Gardenchick - the top is the Pleione mixed media tunic, an Angie pick that a lot of forum members have purchased. It looks especially great on N-Marie!&#038;nbsp;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I like the semi-tucked versions, too -- you are right, it changes the proportion. Again, if the top and pants were less high contrast this would be less noticeable.&#038;nbsp;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>gardenchick on "Proportions experiment
ETA: tucked top pics added"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/proportions-experiment-1#post-1333902</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 04:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>gardenchick</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1333902@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;This is interesting, thanks for sharing!&#060;br /&#062;
I love the top, where is it from? Very flattering on you, really like that color.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Laura (rhubarbgirl) on "Proportions experiment
ETA: tucked top pics added"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/proportions-experiment-1#post-1333480</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Laura (rhubarbgirl)</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1333480@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I agree that 1 and 4 are great. I almost want the top in 2 to be a tad bit shorter. I often find that tops that work with pants don't work well with skirts, and vice versa.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Great colors on you, by the way.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>E on "Proportions experiment
ETA: tucked top pics added"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/proportions-experiment-1#post-1333446</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1333446@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;This was such a great lesson for my eyes too! I really like the shorts &#038;amp; the shorter skinnies, as well as the straight skirt. So I agree with you &#038;amp; all the other commenters. :)&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I need to do something similar to figure out the best topper lengths for me.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Anonymous on "Proportions experiment
ETA: tucked top pics added"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/proportions-experiment-1#post-1333435</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1333435@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;This is interesting- and a good exercise for us all to test our &#034;eye&#034; on proportions. Glad you did this. I like the same ones you do, but also do not mind at all the &#034;maybe&#034; skirt version. I can't quite articulate why, but I think it works - fluid and casual, looks very easy to wear. &#038;nbsp;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Alana in Canada on "Proportions experiment
ETA: tucked top pics added"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/proportions-experiment-1#post-1333434</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Alana in Canada</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1333434@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Fascinating. What we're evaluating here is the amount of leg showing--and how that balances the dark top. In every case, where there is more leg, things look better. Is that because of bone structure--or proportions? I haven't a clue.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;What Tanya said.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;However, I would be curious to see this experiment repeated with the tops tucked or semi-tucked. I wonder how much of a difference that would make?&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I love this colour combination on you--that shade of red is gorgeous.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Suz on "Proportions experiment
ETA: tucked top pics added"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/proportions-experiment-1#post-1333433</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Suz</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1333433@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;What a great post! I love these kinds of comparisons. It's great you could do this with all light bottoms as well.&#038;nbsp;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;It's really hard to understand that 1/3 - 2/3 ratio thing with respect to individual bodies, but you've given a great illustration. I always wondered if it was just the clothing I should measure or should I include my head and the rest of me (whatever is not covered by the clothing) in these ratios. From your example, it seems just the clothes?&#038;nbsp;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Hmmm.&#038;nbsp;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Anyway, I concur that 1, 2, and 4 work very well while the other two are not as good.&#038;nbsp;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;You can fudge a bit with these proportions by making the outfit lower contrast.&#038;nbsp;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;You can also wear this top semi-tucked, for a different type of proportion entirely.&#038;nbsp;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Anonymous on "Proportions experiment
ETA: tucked top pics added"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/proportions-experiment-1#post-1333418</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1333418@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I like the version with the shorts best.  Nice color combos!
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Tanya on "Proportions experiment
ETA: tucked top pics added"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/proportions-experiment-1#post-1333417</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Tanya</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1333417@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I think that #1, #2 and #4 all work wonderfully!
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>N-Marie on "Proportions experiment
ETA: tucked top pics added"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/proportions-experiment-1#post-1333416</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>N-Marie</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1333416@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;From my last post, I got some valuable feedback about pants length and using a 1/3: 2/3 ratio when dressing. I was still not completely sure how that would look in real life with my own body proportions, so I did a little experiment with a white bottom/colored top combination.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;1) Shorts with top - this seems like less than 1/3, but it was my husband's preferred length, &#038;nbsp;:)&#060;br /&#062;2) shorter skirt - this is probably the closest to the 1/3 ratio, and I do think it has a nice balance to it&#060;br /&#062;3) longer skirt- yikes, this doesn't look right, but I think the volume of the skirt &#038;nbsp;may be part of&#038;nbsp;the issue&#060;br /&#062;4) YLF-recommended pant length - more than&#038;nbsp;1/3 but not not splitting in half either&#060;br /&#062;5) my original length (ankle-length)- spltis body in half,&#038;nbsp;very &#034;stumpifying&#034;, when viewed alongside the others&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Am I getting closer? This was my summary (untucked)&#060;br /&#062;1- maybe?&#060;br /&#062;2- yes&#060;br /&#062;3- maybe, with a more fitted skirt&#060;br /&#062;4- yes&#060;br /&#062;5- no!&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;ETA: as requested, tucked top version are now included - it really does change proportions!&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;- The longer skirt (3)&#038;nbsp;and pants (5)&#038;nbsp;don't look quite as unbalnaced with the extra leg length from tucking&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;bonus pic of my sidekick- just up from his nap so I'll check back in at bedtime ;)&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	