<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: Photoshop at work</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/photoshop-at-work</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 02:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/photoshop-at-work" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>Deborah on "Photoshop at work"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/photoshop-at-work#post-751978</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">751978@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;The removal of the straps is somewhat misleading:(. What bothers me is that the original photos are gorgeous and it's so disappointing that such minor things are airbrushed.  The models become so &#034;perfect&#034; relateability is almost impossible.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Mander on "Photoshop at work"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/photoshop-at-work#post-751975</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Mander</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">751975@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I can barely see the difference in some of these, but at least now I understand why the models always seem more uplifted in strapless tops!
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Aida on "Photoshop at work"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/photoshop-at-work#post-750597</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Aida</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">750597@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;That's a whole lot of effort for very little gain  <span aria-hidden="true" class="emoticon emoticon-wink icon-emoticon-wink "></span> 
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Diana on "Photoshop at work"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/photoshop-at-work#post-750558</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 23:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">750558@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I agree with you, this is not nearly as bad as I would have expected.  I think I'm just inured to a certain level of photoshopping in all images I see.  To be honest, what bugs me more is that they blatantly change details of the clothing, like removing straps.  This seems dishonest when the point of these ads is to sell said clothing.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Mo on "Photoshop at work"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/photoshop-at-work#post-750472</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Mo</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">750472@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I just want to know when anyone would want 'less defined abs'??   I get making things look 'better' but I had no idea a smoother stomach was more desirable than ab muscles.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Echo on "Photoshop at work"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/photoshop-at-work#post-750469</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Echo</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">750469@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I worked at the major printing house where Playboy was/is printed, and you would not BELIEVE the files of a lot of the celebrities published there. The difference was night and day in terms of slimming middles and limbs and enhancing breasts and erasing marks on skin. A lot of the younger women's photos were like the VS pictures and didn't seem incredibly different - just touches up here and there and enhancements here and there. But famous people? Most of them didn't look ANYTHING like the published pictures.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>biscuitsmom on "Photoshop at work"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/photoshop-at-work#post-750462</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>biscuitsmom</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">750462@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Still....Ayup
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>annagybe on "Photoshop at work"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/photoshop-at-work#post-750450</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>annagybe</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">750450@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;A break down of a Victoria's Secret catalog. It's not as overdone as I expected.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;a href=&#034;http://jezebel.com/5951863/when-perfect-isnt-enough-the-unretouched-images-victorias-secret-doesnt-want-you-to-see/gallery/1&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;http://jezebel.com/5951863/whe...../gallery/1&#060;/a&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	