https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/pants-old-navy-pixie-v-br-sloan Style Advice for Fashion Lovers en-US Sat, 04 Apr 2026 02:24:32 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/pants-old-navy-pixie-v-br-sloan#post-1175241 Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:02:52 +0000 adorkable 1175241@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>This is good to know. Thanks!</p> <p>My black pants are the Sloans, and I do love them - but dry cleaning is so expensive!</p> <p>I bought cobalt Sloans along with the black but I am thinking I&nbsp;might return them and get the Pixies instead... </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/pants-old-navy-pixie-v-br-sloan#post-1175235 Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:49:21 +0000 shoppingisfun 1175235@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>I just bought both of these! I took the same size in both brands. They fit basically the same. same length, hips the same...BR waist gave me a very slightly bigger waist gap. The BR pants feel "higher quality," of course. But construction is decent on the ON version. There is a little side "vent" at the bottom of the legs on the BR version, which might make hemming more expensive (if you need to hem). I would say if you plan to wear them a whole lot, it might pay to keep the BR version, because I'm guessing they will last longer. Then again you could buy the ON version in 2 or 3 colors for the same price! </p> <p>ETA: so I plan on exchanging my black Sloans for a gray pair (ON does not come in gray) and keeping my black ON's. The ON pant does feel a wee bit less substantial, but it is not really thin either (if it was I wouldn't wear them,gotta hide the cellulite. Ugh). Also, I sized up one size in both brands (bought a 2P instead of a 0P), because in my normal size both were too tight, especially on the hips. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/pants-old-navy-pixie-v-br-sloan#post-1175226 Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:38:43 +0000 Liz A. 1175226@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>I've tried both. ATM I've having a hard time remembering exactly since it's been a while since I tried the sloans. I seem to recall that the sloans were more substantial in fabrication. The pixies are extremely stretchy and comfy like leggings, but didn't look like leggings... More like the fabrication of j. Crew's pixie pant actually. I'll check my archives to see if I can find pics of both. Not sure if I still have them though. If it makes a difference I didn't keep either although I thought hard about both. The pixies gapped at the waist a little on my x shape figure. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/pants-old-navy-pixie-v-br-sloan#post-1175190 Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:55:16 +0000 Kristin L 1175190@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>I don't know anything about them, but I'm curious to hear what everyone says.&nbsp; </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/pants-old-navy-pixie-v-br-sloan#post-1175187 Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:53:31 +0000 adorkable 1175187@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>Has anyone tried Old Navy's Pixie pants?</p> <p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://oldnavy.gap.com/browse/product.do?pid=525427&amp;locale=en_US&amp;kwid=1&amp;sem=false&amp;sdReferer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F#close">http://oldnavy.gap.com/browse/.....r=https%3A</a></p> <p>In the picture, they look almost indistinguishable from the BR Sloans, they cost a third as much,&nbsp;*and* they're machine washable. If anyone has thoughts on similarities/differences in fit and construction, I would love to hear them! </p>