<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: OT: Remember that Dakota Fanning perfume ad? Banned in the UK!</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 22:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>Claudia on "OT: Remember that Dakota Fanning perfume ad? Banned in the UK!"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk#post-463507</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Claudia</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">463507@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I didn't even notice the &#034;Oh Lola.&#034; Yeah, no mistaking the intent. Ugh.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Ves on "OT: Remember that Dakota Fanning perfume ad? Banned in the UK!"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk#post-463504</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Ves</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">463504@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;The ad says &#034;Oh Lola&#034; on it.  Lolita is exactly what they wanted to convey.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>ironkurtin on "OT: Remember that Dakota Fanning perfume ad? Banned in the UK!"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk#post-463447</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 22:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>ironkurtin</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">463447@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Oh, I thought that as supposed to look like she had some kind of weird flower sea-anemone-like penis.  Whatever it means, it doesn't make me want to wear the perfume - or even smell it.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Claudia on "OT: Remember that Dakota Fanning perfume ad? Banned in the UK!"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk#post-463444</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 22:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Claudia</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">463444@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I agree that this is a questionable ad and that it is provocative for all the wrong reasons. Having just raised a daughter to young adulthood, I am sensitive to the sexual and, yes, creepy overtones.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>NK on "OT: Remember that Dakota Fanning perfume ad? Banned in the UK!"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk#post-463436</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 22:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>NK</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">463436@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;And what's with the quality of the photo?  The shadows and lighting seem off, is it supposed to look like an amateur photographer took the photo?  That just seems to add to the pedophile vibe of it.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>annagybe on "OT: Remember that Dakota Fanning perfume ad? Banned in the UK!"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk#post-463433</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 22:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>annagybe</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">463433@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I'm becoming less and less enamored of Marc Jacobs. He's becoming the enfant terrible of fashion.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>NK on "OT: Remember that Dakota Fanning perfume ad? Banned in the UK!"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk#post-463430</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 22:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>NK</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">463430@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Exactly what I was thinking!  She does look young and childlike and oblivious.  I found it creepy and wondered what her parents were thinking when they saw it.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Mamapicklejuice on "OT: Remember that Dakota Fanning perfume ad? Banned in the UK!"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk#post-463418</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Mamapicklejuice</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">463418@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;rae - if anything, the fact that she is made up to look so young and childlike in an overtly sexual ad (flower between the legs) is even more disturbing to me.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;ETA Marc Jacob's statement/denial is disgusting and insulting.  You want to shock, Marc?  Then OWN IT.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>rae on "OT: Remember that Dakota Fanning perfume ad? Banned in the UK!"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk#post-463411</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rae</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">463411@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Yikes, if there is a nude one! I don't know how they'd get away with that... &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Interesting that you see it as asexual, rachylou. I felt very taken aback by the overtness of it myself... young girl prone, fingering the flower-that-isn't-a-flower between her legs... o_0 I blame it on the Liberal Arts degree.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>catgirl on "OT: Remember that Dakota Fanning perfume ad? Banned in the UK!"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk#post-463387</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>catgirl</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">463387@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Oh, maybe that was it.  They found another ad with someone nude - I wasn't paying a whole lot of attention to them at that point.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>rachylou on "OT: Remember that Dakota Fanning perfume ad? Banned in the UK!"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk#post-463383</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rachylou</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">463383@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Not the nude one (haven't seen that!). She's in a girly dress with a giant bottle of perfume, capped with a flower, between her legs. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Actually, aesthetically, I find it one of the most asexual photographs I've ever seen.  Not even Lolita fetish. More wasting urban waif.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>catgirl on "OT: Remember that Dakota Fanning perfume ad? Banned in the UK!"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk#post-463335</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 20:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>catgirl</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">463335@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Is this the nudie one?  My husband and his buddy were thumbing through my In Style (looking for Blake Lively - don't ask) and drooled all over that ad.  Never mind that they are both technically old enough to be her dad, as I was quick to remind them.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>rae on "OT: Remember that Dakota Fanning perfume ad? Banned in the UK!"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/ot-remember-that-dakota-fanning-perfume-ad-banned-in-the-uk#post-463246</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rae</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">463246@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;&#060;a href=&#034;http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2011/11/09/dakota-fanning-oh-lola-banned-uk/?xid=popsugar&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;http://stylenews.peoplestylewa.....d=popsugar&#060;/a&#062;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I'm not too shocked, since the UK seems to be more handsy with the morality laws than some other places. Also, I'm thinking back to Art History class, and if you view it in light of some of the old art convetions (flowers to reference genitalia, hands-on-thighs to signal masturbation), the ad really does seem to sexualize a child. Maybe the UK would be more sensitive to those kinds of things than the US. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;On the other hand, what kinds of ads was Britney Spears doing when she was 17? No censorship there. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;On the *other* hand, Britney seemed more developed and styled to look older. Dakota seems styled to look even younger than she is. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Thoughts?
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	