<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: NAS: round more</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/nas-round-more</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 01:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/nas-round-more" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>catherine on "NAS: round more"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/nas-round-more#post-1946664</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 03:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1946664@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I love those pants.  They look really great on you.  And versatile.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>rachylou on "NAS: round more"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/nas-round-more#post-1946575</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 19:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rachylou</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1946575@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;The pants are great! I quite like the loafers.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Anonymous on "NAS: round more"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/nas-round-more#post-1946558</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 17:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1946558@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Ok good. It looks low on the model too!
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>unfrumped on "NAS: round more"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/nas-round-more#post-1946553</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 17:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>unfrumped</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1946553@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;CJ, one reason I showed the Topshop sweater is that I agree with Angie - sleeves are not overly dramatic in shape, which led me to try it, so might work well for some.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Anonymous on "NAS: round more"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/nas-round-more#post-1946524</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 15:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1946524@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Ding dong sleeves that irritate and make me want to reach for the shears and trim them would be a returnee for me. Love that mulberry color!  Makes me happy.  The new size of pant fit well and seem like they will be a go-to item, a workhorse.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>unfrumped on "NAS: round more"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/nas-round-more#post-1946520</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 15:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>unfrumped</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1946520@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Thanks for comments!&#060;br /&#062;
suntiger, it’s hard to see with the dark pants and the way I’m standing with legs  together , but the crotch is not low. I think you’re seeing the effect of the full pant legs and “ carrot” shape.  I was afraid they’d be too tight in the back seam in this size,  but just made it.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Anonymous on "NAS: round more"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/nas-round-more#post-1946490</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 14:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1946490@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Breaking w Angie here...the crotch seems very low, almost to harem but not quite. Meaning also the back view may have sag...check if you can!&#060;br /&#062;
I am admiring that dark floral skirt though!
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Angie on "NAS: round more"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/nas-round-more#post-1946477</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 13:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1946477@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;The pants sized down look FABULOUS.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I shan't bop you over the head :)&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Yeah, too long bell sleeves are annoying. Back it goes.&#038;nbsp;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>CocoLion on "NAS: round more"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/nas-round-more#post-1946408</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 08:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>CocoLion</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1946408@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Love the pants on you. &#038;nbsp;They are different while flattering and graceful. &#038;nbsp;As for shoes, the loafers look great with your shapely legs. &#038;nbsp;I've heard great things about PGs but haven't tried them myself (aside from an in-store try on where I felt they weren't wide enough for my foot type).&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I'm happy with most of my Vince sweaters, some have pilled but I've learned to live with it (or pull out the de-fuzzing brick more often). &#038;nbsp;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Anonymous on "NAS: round more"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/nas-round-more#post-1946380</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 04:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1946380@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;What Suz said.  I chuckled at the &#034;Joy test&#034;, and you convinced me to return the NAS Gallery vest that I love but would still be looking for a lighter shade. If it looked in r/l like it looks online, it would have been perfect.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Suz on "NAS: round more"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/nas-round-more#post-1946373</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 03:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Suz</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1946373@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;The new size of pants looks great on you! Glad you re-ordered them. You will enjoy them. I also love the loafers (if comfort is there) and the mulberry sweater. So pretty -- such a rich colour.&#038;nbsp;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I think you did extremely well. I understand the reasoning for your no and maybe items and tend to think if the joy factor isn't there, wait -- something else will turn up later in the season.&#038;nbsp;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>unfrumped on "NAS: round more"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/nas-round-more#post-1946371</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 02:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>unfrumped</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1946371@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Pic 1-2 :The saga of the Lewit trouser continues. I decided I might chance the hem-hang but that the pants were too big, even for my high-baggy leg tolerance. I was not optimistic the size down would fit and had just about decided to pass or perhaps see if went on sale again in late winter. But then I ordered the other size and I like them much better. Still very carrot on the leg but a neater fit. This makes them more versatile for me. I will tuck, mostly, but would also try &#034;cropped&#034; sweater out (if Angie doesn't bop me on the head). That would give very different looks and so more repeats of pants. Still plan to experiment at home&#038;nbsp; with them for how the hem does.&#060;br /&#062;Pic 2 is Topshop cropped sweater. It is a great length for very high waist items (otherwise would be too short) but I plan to return because: the bell sleeve, while not too belled. is too long and will be an issue, since I won't usually just wear sweater --meaning, not enough occasions. so is a problem for workwear, If bell were bracelet length or sleeves were long and straight I could deal. Also, while it's a great winter color or near-neutral, I am working toward less deep, dark colors. So it will not be versatile enough.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;3 Vince cashmere sweater in mulberry. I went for the color. Is pretty deep but more plummy than the Topshop and more brightening. Softer and not itchy. I'm leaning toward keeping but I've not gone through my winter sweaters to see what it replaces, how they all fit. Nor have I tried it on with other bottoms. Thinking.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;All pics. \PG studded loafer. I tried gray suede because... Gray.&#038;nbsp; Suede.I'm conflicted, a bit. They're comfortable but not to -die-for but with suede that usually gets better. It may be the stiffer sole. Very lightweight, which is good. Heel slips but not with insert. I wish I could try 1/2 size down but doubt toes would like that.&#060;br /&#062;Here's the rub.&#038;nbsp; Loafers + bare-ankle look is not a winter deal for me. With my AGL black suede loafer I wore with some types of pants with a black trouser sock, &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;and I wear loafers + tights with skirts in winter.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;and then into spring with nude hose.&#038;nbsp; &#038;nbsp;Used to have a black Halogen creeper-sole loafer for some of that. Would these work for that or look weird? Gray is harder than black but I wear gray tights a lot. I was also a bit unsure of the studs for my environmental norm at work but I think would be okay. Need to think about this.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Things that did not work:&#060;br /&#062;EF scarf: Entranced by Jenn's pics. to me it was not true rust, is more red or even the EF Dark Tulip. Lovely weave. BUT too dark for my coloring now. Yay.pocketbook.&#038;nbsp; I compared to the animal print scarf which I had targeted for its light and dark colors and yep, that combination of dark +pale works best for face colors.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;EF silk top in Dark Tulip. Because...Dark Tulip. Same as my EF dress. I tried 3 different sizes before coming to my senses. Neckline is more a mock, not at all like the photo, and really it's just too tunic-like for what I wear--cuts me in half (tried 2 petite sizes )&#038;nbsp; Her similar T top I thought too short from the measurements. I have also to remember that the EF dress has its own other benefits--good color&#038;nbsp; + length and drape + the wide neck added lightness to the look. Step away from the pretty colors.......&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Trench in the rose color. Also tried the shorter poly-cotton trench. Colors are slightly different in the different fabrics. Modern one is too long and too A-line for me. Other one is browner but better length and style. Color was interesting to me and would go with most of my wardrobe but I think it's too dark, which surprises me a lot.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;PG pointy loafer . Wah, wah. I knew at heart I should not go pointy, but--suede! so I stalked. Looks great but my toes cant' do it. Not a problem for bunion issues but toe tips.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;AG ex-boyfriend jeans. They actually fit much like the pic. And a comfy denim. But don't like the whiskering pattern and meanwhile found BR girlfriend jeans for a tiny fraction of price that I like better.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Thinking: about:&#038;nbsp; PG bootie. Too high heeled but I thought the calf fit might be nicely snug. Not as much as I hoped. I need to replace Munro booties that I've lived in for 3 winters. Least flower-pot I've ever had but they always were narrow in the forefoot and I don't think I can wear them all day now. They had 2 roles; with skirts, were more refined. Then, the fit was so close that straight pants would slide over them and not hang up on shaft. But, these don't work the same. If I use the &#034;Joy&#034; test, I will still be looking for the right ones.&#038;nbsp;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Thanks for reading! Comments welcome.&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	