https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants Style Advice for Fashion Lovers en-US Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:32:33 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2141492 Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:56:00 +0000 rachylou 2141492@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>I agree they're kinda stiff... but the idea is cool... </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2141225 Fri, 28 Aug 2020 18:48:16 +0000 Style Fan 2141225@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>They are cute but the material would drive me nuts.&nbsp; It is so difficult to tell what the rise is on pants.&nbsp; 9.5" is the rise on my Frame jeans according to the website and I would call those jeans midrise. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2141138 Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:20:36 +0000 Bijou 2141138@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>They are close to being right, but a flowing and non-crush fabric would make these so much more wearable. I am glad you are sending them back. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2141131 Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:25:14 +0000 RobinF 2141131@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>They are a cute style but I can see why they might feel too stiff. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2141072 Fri, 28 Aug 2020 05:23:24 +0000 Anonymous 2141072@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>Cute on you and the sort of bookend you’re hair. Enjoy. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2141058 Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:28:15 +0000 Jaime 2141058@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>That kind of material drives me crazy. It always comes out of the wash a wrinkled mess. I see the concept and am ready for it, but, exactly as you say, in a drapier material. Hope you find it! </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2140977 Thu, 27 Aug 2020 17:52:35 +0000 Angie 2140977@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>Too about the creasing - that would drive me batty too. Super cute look though!&nbsp; </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2140961 Thu, 27 Aug 2020 16:50:02 +0000 kkards 2140961@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>Thanks for modeling them for us. Interesting because they definitely look low rise on you, but mid rise on the models.&nbsp;<br />I actually think they look like they are the right size, but then i like my clothes a little big so there’s that.</p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2140958 Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:42:51 +0000 unfrumped 2140958@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>Thanks for showing.<br /> Rises are so individual and so variable even amongst descriptions and measurements.<br /> I think rise is one of those things that becomes almost one’s personal or signature style that has to transcend trends, because it’s so related to proper fit ( notwithstanding comfort). Not meaning there’s only ONE per person, but a range that fits well , related to hips, tummy, ribcage, shirt tuck works or wearing untucked works, etc. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2140956 Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:28:01 +0000 nuancedream 2140956@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>They're very cute pants, but definitely too large for you. I like poplin for button down shirts, but I would question how well it would work for wide leg pants. Too stiff IMO. I prefer material with a little more "flop" for wide leg pants. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2140950 Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:18:06 +0000 Suz 2140950@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>Interesting! It looks as if they would be great for casual days in early fall...if the fit were what you wanted... </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2140941 Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:38:15 +0000 cindysmith 2140941@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>They're cute pants. </p> <p>I'm so short through the torso that a 9.5 would be a mid rise for me. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2140938 Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:23:29 +0000 always trying 2140938@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>they look great on you. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2140937 Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:17:59 +0000 Janet 2140937@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>They do look at least a size big on you, but I have to say I miss *slightly* low rises (they just suit my body type better than all these high rises) and I love a roomy vibe. If it weren't for the pleats, and maybe in a different color, I'd be tempted to try those myself. 9.5" rise is really good on me (my rise is so short that 10" is high). </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2140929 Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:18:17 +0000 Jules 2140929@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>Yes those are a pretty specific ‘look’ aren’t they? Cool but you would have to love them, I think.<br /> Edit, I just looked at the stock photos. The models are wearing them higher so yes I tend to agree yours are a size big. I also note all stylings have at least an inch of skin showing above the waist. I think they are probably trickier to style without that. Overall they read as summer pants to me. I can see them on my daughter. It’s not a body thing, it’s more that the proportions seem trendy/youthful. This probably reflects my own lack of imagination. </p> https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/low-rise-wide-leg-pants#post-2140928 Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:12:40 +0000 UmmLila (Lisa) 2140928@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/ <p>I mentioned a little while ago that I was thinking about a low-rise, wide-leg silhouette, and these pants in particular. &lt;<a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.freepeople.com/shop/marina-low-rise-pants/?category=pants&amp;color=031&amp;type=REGULAR&amp;quantity=1">https://www.freepeople.com/sho.....quantity=1</a>&gt;</p> <p>I ordered them, and they are definitely low rise (the product description says 9.5 inches, which I would not have ordinarily considered low), and wide in the legs. A size down from my usual would have been a better fit. I think they might have been a possibility for me if they had more drape, but they are almost like a super-heavy poplin weave (they really needed ironing, too). So they're going back.</p>