<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: H &#38; M admits to</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 23:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/h-m-admits-to" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>rae on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-483188</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rae</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">483188@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;&#034;… we are doing this to show off the garments.”&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;PFFT! Your logic is not like our earth logic. Behold, H&#038;amp;M: &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Statement 1: a &#034;garment&#034; = a product with the function of covering and flattering a human body.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Statement 2: &#034;showing off&#034; an item = demonstrating its functions and qualities.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;If 1 and 2 hold true, then &#034;showing off&#034; a &#034;garment&#034; = demonstrating how the garment covers and flatters a human body. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Therefore, a garment cannot be shown off on an inhuman body. If the product CAN be adequately &#034;shown off&#034; on an inanimate object, then it is not, in fact a &#034;garment.&#034; &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;(insert death glare here)
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>missvee on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-483151</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>missvee</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">483151@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I think we all know that photos are routinely retouched or 'enhanced' in some way, but it's a good reminder to make sure that our daughters, nieces, etc are aware of it too.  I guess retailers think that they couldn't sell their garments if they were shown on 'real' women...
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>chewyspaghetti on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-483124</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>chewyspaghetti</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">483124@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;It makes you wonder who else is doing this and not talking about it.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>HeleenH on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-483046</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>HeleenH</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">483046@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;As long as it is clear it are manequins, I am fine with it. I do educate my DD13 and DD6 about the issue of photoshoped pictures. The other day I saw this link on facebook &#060;a href=&#034;http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/downloads/publications/pnas11/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/fa.....ns/pnas11/&#060;/a&#062; and it shows again how pictures can be distorted. For instance this one. I prefer the before picture.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Mo on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-483035</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Mo</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">483035@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I figure they should just leave it looking like a mannequin if they are going to use mannequins.  But as for using 'real' models, I have to say with the commonplace practice of plastic surgery being used by so many people, models or not, what's 'real' anymore anyway?  I understand not wanting to have your kids emulate the unattainable, but I don't look at mannequins in malls and think I should look like them, so I see the computer mannequin in much the same way.  The magazines full of celebs are way more damaging to body image, I believe.  But now I'm getting off tangent . . .sorry!&#060;br /&#062;
At least they are telling us this is what they are doing.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>cheryl on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-483031</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>cheryl</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">483031@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I just think its ridiculous, but i agree they must be trying to save a penny.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Abi on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-482871</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Abi</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">482871@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;All this does is make me think the clothes don't flatter anyone if even models have to be replaced with CGI! Not a great advert.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Another side note...but why would a model need to sing anyway?
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>rosee on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-482850</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 07:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rosee</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">482850@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;oh grrrrr!  ( I have too much to say against that and it's just coming out as one big grrrrr right now).
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>RandomThoughts (Andrea) on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-482840</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 06:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>RandomThoughts (Andrea)</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">482840@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;It's pathetic that even these thin, young, beautiful women aren't good enough for them. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Tangentially related, I was watching (yes, I know....) America's Next Top Model and they all had to record a song and do a video. They were all absolutely awful singers. I mean, I now feel much better about my decidedly off-key voice.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;But after they ran those girls' voices through filter after filter and audio tuned them, well they actually sounded like they could sing. Pretty sad. I mean, if you really _can_ sing is there even a point if you're not drop dead gorgeous?
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Marley on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-482834</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 06:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Marley</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">482834@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Creepy and disgusting and sad!
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Scarlet on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-482827</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 05:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Scarlet</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">482827@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Ha! This is probably a cost-cutting measure. And why not? They photo-shop model's bodies too, so why even start with something real. Pretty sad state though, isn't it.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>HelenInCanada on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-482796</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 04:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>HelenInCanada</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">482796@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;That angers and saddens me.  Why not use real models (of varying sizes)?  I do understand that they want to flatter the clothes, show them off well - which they can do on actual women!  Is it a cost thing...?!  I'm at a loss for why they are resorting to CGI.  At least the info is made public!  Women should be aware that the bodies are not real.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>ironkurtin on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-482791</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 04:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>ironkurtin</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">482791@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I plan to teach my kid that media is pretty much a fantasy, just like a cartoon like Avatar the Last Airbender or a live-action movie like Narnia.  She can't be Ang or Aslan, because they aren't real -- just like fashion models.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Sveta on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-482778</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 03:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Sveta</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">482778@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;This is crazy - talk about a quest for perfection!&#060;br /&#062;
I am so happy YLF is about real people!
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Isabel on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-482771</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 03:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Isabel</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">482771@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;OMG !   I was looking closely at some blown up pics of Gwen Stefani and SJP today and thinking that their skin just can't be that perfect.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;It makes me sad. Is this what my daughter will compare herself to ?
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>cheryl on "H &#38; M admits to"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/h-m-admits-to#post-482763</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 03:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>cheryl</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">482763@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;&#060;a href=&#034;http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/blogs/2011/lifestyle/hm-admits-to-using-fake-bodies-for-models/?cmpid=FCST_hero_hot&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/b.....T_hero_hot&#060;/a&#062;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Whats wrong with real people?
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	