<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: Giant Finds photos</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/giant-finds-photos</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 01:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/giant-finds-photos" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>Aida on "Giant Finds photos"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/giant-finds-photos#post-1494756</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 22:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Aida</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1494756@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I've been thinking about this all day and haven't come up with a good solution. Constraining the ratio doesn't seem like a good option because, as you said, many of the Finds images are then going to look funny. The only thing that came to mind was using some sort of max area envelope, but not sure that's possible with html and all that. The Amazon images are almost always on a white background, so it's possible that padding those images only could be a hack sort of solution. I suppose I'll just have to get used to seeing some giant hair products in my Finds, now and then  <span aria-hidden="true" class="emoticon emoticon-wink icon-emoticon-wink "></span> 
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Greg on "Giant Finds photos"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/giant-finds-photos#post-1494385</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 02:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1494385@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I noticed that too. :-)&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;All of the images are resized and I store different resolution versions for different purposes.&#038;nbsp;It is really the unusual aspect ratio of the pictures that's causing this. Amazon sometimes have pictures where less care has been taken and they end up tall and skinny like these ones.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I can constrain the aspect ratio on the cards (i.e. force the pictures to be more squat), but that might look odd in other ways. The two options I can think of are cropping vertically and padding horizontally. If all backgrounds were white, then padding would be the obvious answer, but backgrounds are often not white.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;This doesn't happen all that often so I'm not overly worried, but&#038;nbsp;I'm open to suggestions. It might boil down to just choosing the least bad of the options.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Aida on "Giant Finds photos"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/giant-finds-photos#post-1494290</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 23:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Aida</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1494290@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I was adding some beauty category products from Amazon and a few of them came with enormous photos. I've attached the two most giant, along with two other quite-large photos. Not sure how easy it would be to scale them down, but they feel too large for default &#034;medium&#034; size setting; they're still quite large at &#034;small&#034; and ridiculously large at &#034;large&#034;.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	