<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: Experimenting with cuffs</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 19:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>Gigi on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614919</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 07:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Gigi</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614919@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I like them all, though #3 is my least favorite. #4 looks retro to me; 1 and 2 look more modern. I think the shoes look OK with the cuffs.  <span aria-hidden="true" class="emoticon emoticon-smile icon-emoticon-smile "></span> 
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Jenn on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614813</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614813@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Love the cuffs. I agree with everyone that #1 is best, but they're all good. If you want a more devil-may-care look, I've been doing one similar to #1 except folding it up to the double-cuff length and then folding that in half, which leaves jeans hem slightly visible at the top. Fun. Photo below is from denimhunters.com
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>rachylou on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614812</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rachylou</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614812@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I think your pants are pulled high in number two... I think closer to the ankle bone is best.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Anonymous on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614646</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614646@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Ah ok. Well, I think the shoes are great with the jeans. Just a different look.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>shaz on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614641</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>shaz</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614641@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Not at all I just should have read the whole post first but I get eager to see the clothes
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Ginger on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614637</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Ginger</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614637@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Hahaha! I should have clarified!  <span aria-hidden="true" class="emoticon emoticon-biggrin icon-emoticon-biggrin "></span>  Thanks!
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>shaz on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614636</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>shaz</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614636@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;There's me clever girl that I am looking at your sleeves for cuffs and wondering why I could not see any  As for your jeans they all look good to me but I like the first and last one best
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Ginger on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614611</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Ginger</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614611@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I do like the height! Diana made a good point about straight legs. I really can't go higher with these; the folded ankle gets too tight. Jeans are a &#060;i&#062;major &#060;/i&#062;difficulty for me, and not a wardrobe staple, so I'll probably just stick with low cuffs. :D&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I think by the shoes, I more meant the height of the vamp and thickness&#060;br /&#062;
of the cushy material. They're heavy, visually. The oxfords are pretty basic wingtips, very sleek. I feel like Mary Tyler Moore on the Dick Van Dyke Show, in her capris. :D&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Anonymous on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614568</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614568@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;4 and 2! For me it's all about the height and less about cuff size :-)&#060;br /&#062;I don't think the shoes are throwing anything off. Maybe you're just used to dressier shoes?&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Ginger on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614565</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Ginger</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614565@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Perfect! Thank you so much! #1 was my first choice, but by the time I experimented I was second-guessing everything I saw.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Anonymous on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614544</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614544@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;As Diana says &#038;nbsp;:) Cute shoes - really like those!&#060;div&#062;&#060;br /&#062;&#060;/div&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Diana on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614541</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614541@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I agree that with these shoes and the particular jeans, the narrower cuff works better. I personally prefer the big cuff on a more straight-leg jean as I think it produces a cleaner line with no binding where the tapered cuff cuts into your leg.&#038;nbsp; &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Anonymous on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614534</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614534@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;What Angie said  <span aria-hidden="true" class="emoticon emoticon-smile icon-emoticon-smile "></span> 
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Angie on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614521</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614521@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;They all work. I like #1 best.&#038;nbsp;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>shedev on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614518</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>shedev</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614518@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I like #1 best.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Anonymous on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614503</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 14:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614503@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I'm no expert but like the narrow cuff of 1 and 2 best.  It seems more modern.  Love the shiny loafers.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Ginger on "Experimenting with cuffs"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/experimenting-with-cuffs#post-1614493</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 14:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Ginger</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1614493@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;This winter has been weird and mild. January and February overall has shown an early spring pattern: south wind and north wind back and forth, switching every 12 to 48 hours, with corresponding temperature changes. A real delight for people with allergies! And it doesn't make dressing much easier, either.&#038;nbsp; Yesterday started in the mid 30s and ended in the upper 70s.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;But it does give me an opportunity to play with mild-temp combinations, like cuffed jeans and no socks. I refuse to wear jeans when it's over 80, and I hate cold feet, so this isn't a combination I'm practiced with. Last week I tried several variations with my blue sneakers. None of them really looked right to me, so I'd love some feedback and other ideas.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;#1 Narrow double fold cuff&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;#2 Narrow triple fold cuff&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;#3 Single deeper cuff at ankle&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;#4 Even deeper single fold cuff&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;These are extra long jeggings; the taper is noticeable with a deep cuff. In #4 it is starting to flare at the fold while being tight higher up on my leg.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I think it's the shoes that are throwing this look for me. Most variations look great with my cognac oxfords; but that's a much lower-profile shoe.&#038;nbsp; (Leg lengthening is not a priority, btw.)
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	