<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: Counting trends: Understatement</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/counting-trends-understatement</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 00:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/counting-trends-understatement" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>rachylou on "Counting trends: Understatement"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/counting-trends-understatement#post-1451425</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 04:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rachylou</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1451425@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Oh I was going to exclaim about the sumptuousness of Dries, but what really got me was the backwards apron!
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Mellllls on "Counting trends: Understatement"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/counting-trends-understatement#post-1451400</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Mellllls</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1451400@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;i am obsessed with rose gold at the moment!
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Aida on "Counting trends: Understatement"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/counting-trends-understatement#post-1451398</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Aida</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1451398@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Shevia, you are speaking my language  <span aria-hidden="true" class="emoticon emoticon-smile icon-emoticon-smile "></span> 
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Jaime on "Counting trends: Understatement"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/counting-trends-understatement#post-1451397</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 03:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Jaime</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1451397@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Click for t&#060;a rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; href=&#034;http://www.style.com/fashion-shows/fall-2015-ready-to-wear/dries-van-noten/collection&#034;&#062;he antidote to understatement.&#060;/a&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>rachylou on "Counting trends: Understatement"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/counting-trends-understatement#post-1451354</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 01:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rachylou</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1451354@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I agree. Understatement does seem like the better word - better than minimalism or normcore.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Laura (rhubarbgirl) on "Counting trends: Understatement"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/counting-trends-understatement#post-1451349</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 01:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Laura (rhubarbgirl)</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1451349@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Understatement is a great word for it! I've been using 'normcore' but that's actually much narrower than the larger trends I'm seeing, even though normcore may be part of it. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;In some ways it reminds me of the early 90s, with the grunge influence and flannel and doc martens with loose dresses and overall a very functional vibe, not a lot of extraneous detail.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>rachylou on "Counting trends: Understatement"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/counting-trends-understatement#post-1451340</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 01:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rachylou</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1451340@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;&#060;b&#062;Kiwi&#060;/b&#062; - I like the idea of patterned and lacy shorts. That mixes things up.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;b&#062;Aida&#060;/b&#062; - You're right. What's new is more along the lines of tweaks. Like people catching up with their own selves.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;b&#062;Chic&#060;/b&#062; - That's the best quote. I've been thinking about gladiator sandals myself - they're kinda having a redux moment. They'll look great with culottes.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;...And on that note, I edited the list to add Gingham. I don't know that it ever goes away, but it's being played up right now. I kinda a want a gingham clutch, except I don't carry purses.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>old chic on "Counting trends: Understatement"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/counting-trends-understatement#post-1451322</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>old chic</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1451322@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;As for understatement, I love minimalism when it is dramatic, but understatement isn't in my fashion vocabulary. My motto has always been a quip from an Oscar Wilde play: &#034;If I am occasionally a little &#060;b&#062;over-dressed&#060;/b&#062;, I make up for it by being always immensely &#060;b&#062;over-educated&#060;/b&#062;.&#034;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>old chic on "Counting trends: Understatement"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/counting-trends-understatement#post-1451320</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>old chic</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1451320@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;My DH has me subscribed to about a dozen fashion magazines, so I see a lot ;)&#038;nbsp; I'm noticing the same as you, Rachylou, except for the cricket sweaters (don't think I've seen one) and the culottes. I am looking for some cool and slightly unconventional culottes for my new knee-high sandals and haven't spotted any yet. For me, the high-waisted pants Aida mentions are welcome relief for my muffin top.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Aida on "Counting trends: Understatement"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/counting-trends-understatement#post-1451276</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 22:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Aida</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1451276@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Totally over minimalism  <span aria-hidden="true" class="emoticon emoticon-biggrin icon-emoticon-biggrin "></span>  Although I suppose I'm never really More Is More, definitely the lower-case version. All of what you are describing sound like what I was seeing &#060;i&#062;last&#060;/i&#062; spring. I haven't really taken a good look at anything new, but my notes of what I was interested in from this season's spring shows when they happened way back when are:
&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;ul&#062;
&#060;li&#062;more black and white&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;70s glam galore&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;prints and print mixing&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;longer length tops&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;lots of sweatshirts/hoodies&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;vests worn as tops&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;more texture than normal&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;slouchy trousers with hems pushed up the calf&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;slouchy khakis&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;baggy basketball shorts (esp. in interesting, non-sporty materials)&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;high waisted pants (boo for me, maybe get to wear slouchy?)&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;/ul&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Not sure if any of that has translated though. Feels like it rarely does *sigh*
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Sal on "Counting trends: Understatement"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/counting-trends-understatement#post-1451252</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 22:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Sal</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1451252@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Yes, understatement/minimalism is strong here too. &#038;nbsp;I think understatement is actually a better term than minimalism as it is not about minimal spend nor making do with what you have, nor really a minimal number of items!!&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Here funky shorts are a strong trend&#038;nbsp;- patterned, lacy,often short but loose. &#038;nbsp;I think they look awesome and are a refreshing change from denim cut offs.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;And blue denim/chambray/double denim is popular too - shirt dresses, shirts, tunics etc...&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>rachylou on "Counting trends: Understatement"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/counting-trends-understatement#post-1451233</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 21:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rachylou</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1451233@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Perusing Saks site. They're calling out understatement as a trend (I guess that would be like minimalism renamed), but it does seem distinctive to me and true. Everything on La Garconne seems &#034;understated&#034; to me. I was getting that feeling from some other sites too. I feel a strong undercurrent of understatement in everything, actually. All the shows, on the street. Even when things are bright and crazy, I feel there's a bit of holding back.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Anyways what have I noted so far?
&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;ul&#062;
&#060;li&#062;Rose gold&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;Sporty luxe - particularly sneakers with dresses and footbed slides&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;Culottes (they seem to have picked up some steam)&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;The colour Poppy (that bright tart red) with light blue&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;Sleeveless jackets&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;The string bow and ruff (since Annagybe pointed it out, I've been seeing more versions)&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;Cricket sweaters&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;ETA: Gingham&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;/ul&#062;
&#060;ul&#062;
&#060;li&#062;&#060;i&#062;Plus&#060;/i&#062; Understatement&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;/ul&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I kinda feel sporty luxe is a part of understatement, and that understatement is a trend in that non-fad, long term sense. A real direction.
&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;And even tho I've seen greens, pinks, and yellows... they don't feel like either trends or fads to me. Can't say why. If they're there, they're there...
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	