<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: Want to deconstruct an ad campaign?</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/care-to-deconstruct-an-ad-campaign</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/care-to-deconstruct-an-ad-campaign" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>kkards on "Want to deconstruct an ad campaign?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/care-to-deconstruct-an-ad-campaign#post-1978339</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>kkards</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1978339@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;so I don't know why, but I can't get this out of my head....i've been goggling all lunch trying to find which &#034;influencers&#034; were invited/attended this event....can't seem to find it....if these people were so&#038;nbsp;influential, &#038;nbsp;wouldn't you expect payless to name names....influential
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Jenn on "Want to deconstruct an ad campaign?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/care-to-deconstruct-an-ad-campaign#post-1978231</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1978231@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Influencers are paid to say nice things about your product. How many are going to go in and say, “well, these seem to be mass-produced out of plastic”?&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;If I were an influencer used this way, I would feel pretty betrayed, and wouldn’t want to do business with this company again. All those people are in business themselves, crafting a reputation and choosing brand partnerships to match.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>kkards on "Want to deconstruct an ad campaign?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/care-to-deconstruct-an-ad-campaign#post-1978199</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 12:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>kkards</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1978199@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;FashIntern...I am a skeptic and cynic at heart.  But it is/was a clever piece of marketing.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Stagiaire Fash on "Want to deconstruct an ad campaign?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/care-to-deconstruct-an-ad-campaign#post-1978189</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Stagiaire Fash</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1978189@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Kkards, I’m now blocked by a message that says this content is for subscribers only. I don’t think it was there a few days ago. Strange...&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Thanks for posting the link to the CNN article. It sounds very similar to the copy in the other article, but of course I didn’t have your expert analysis.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>kkards on "Want to deconstruct an ad campaign?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/care-to-deconstruct-an-ad-campaign#post-1978184</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>kkards</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1978184@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;FashIntern --this reminds me of an ad from my childhood that was filmed in a NYC resturant and the subsitiute out something (spaghetti sauce?)..and the customers were &#034;shocked&#034;....&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;anyway....i couldn't read the article you link to on adweek because it required me to registar, but i did goggle it because i was interested....here's my take...&#060;br /&#062;yes, some people were fooled, and yes, price and&#038;nbsp;ambiance impact our&#038;nbsp;perception...but here's the things that bothered me....the influencers who attended were paid to be there, maybe not much, but, still paid. and as they were paid just to show up, i'm sure many of them were counting on a larger pay out, and or more exposure which would increase their &#034;influencer status&#034; in the future. also, CNN states that the 2 days the store existed they did $3,000. so assuming an average retail of $200 (sorry, retail math is what i do for a living), that means they sold 15 pairs of shoes...to 80 people who are predisposed to buying fashion.....that's less than a 20%&#038;nbsp;conversion rate.&#060;br /&#062;i'm more interested in what this says about the &#034;influencer&#034; culture....&#038;nbsp;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;a rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; href=&#034;https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/29/business/payless-fake-store/index.html&#034;&#062;https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/29.....index.html&#060;/a&#062;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;i&#062;from the CNN article...&#060;br /&#062;About 80 influencers attended over two nights, according to Payless. They shelled out a total of $3,000. One shopper spent $640 for a pair of boots, which represented an 1,800% markup. Payless, however, returned their money and let them keep the shoes. Payless said the influencers were paid a small stipend to attend&#060;/i&#062;&#060;strong&#062;&#060;i&#062;.&#060;/i&#062;&#060;/strong&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Stagiaire Fash on "Want to deconstruct an ad campaign?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/care-to-deconstruct-an-ad-campaign#post-1978170</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Stagiaire Fash</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1978170@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;The ads they made from this, I thought, skip over all the interesting stuff about how we assign value to things, and the role other people, and our assumptions about what they think, play in that.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Jaime on "Want to deconstruct an ad campaign?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/care-to-deconstruct-an-ad-campaign#post-1978135</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 03:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Jaime</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1978135@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;That is hysterical and fascinating, although not necessarily surprising. Thanks for sharing!
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>rachylou on "Want to deconstruct an ad campaign?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/care-to-deconstruct-an-ad-campaign#post-1978005</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 20:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>rachylou</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1978005@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;That’s a brilliant marketing stunt. A lot of fun. And great name, ‘Palessi.’ Lol. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;But it does say a lot about people. We use shortcuts to try and assess quality (reality), and that’s a mistake. My parents were very vigilant about this... and everyone scoffs at my one poor uncle because he’s taken in a lot by branding.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Jenni NZ on "Want to deconstruct an ad campaign?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/care-to-deconstruct-an-ad-campaign#post-1977977</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Jenni NZ</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1977977@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;That's awesome! Perception is everything and people can be so up themselves?!&#060;br /&#062;
However, we do also need to know about the supply chain and worker's rights in Payless...
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Stagiaire Fash on "Want to deconstruct an ad campaign?"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/care-to-deconstruct-an-ad-campaign#post-1977974</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Stagiaire Fash</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1977974@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;What do you think of this current US ad campaign? &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;a href=&#034;https://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/payless-opened-a-fake-luxury-store-palessi-to-see-how-much-people-would-pay-for-20-shoes/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;https://www.adweek.com/brand-m.....-20-shoes/&#060;/a&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	