<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: Alter or no? EF Tunics</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/alter-or-no-ef-tunics</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 13:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/alter-or-no-ef-tunics" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>abc on "Alter or no? EF Tunics"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/alter-or-no-ef-tunics#post-1459749</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>abc</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1459749@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I think I am going to hit up the tailor soon. &#038;nbsp;I also haven't taken the time to see exactly how much longer the newer ones are but I'm convinced there is some length difference.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;And just to be clear, I like them, they serve a huge function in my wardrobe and get lots of wear, it's jsut the newer 2 don't feel as fab as the first, for the reasons I've identified above. &#038;nbsp;They're 7.5/10 where the original is 10/10 for me.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Thanks for weighing in, everyone!&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Olivegreen on "Alter or no? EF Tunics"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/alter-or-no-ef-tunics#post-1459746</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Olivegreen</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1459746@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Alterations often increase the happy for me. Not being happy with expensive finds and not wearing them is more expensive?
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Firecracker (Sharan) on "Alter or no? EF Tunics"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/alter-or-no-ef-tunics#post-1459722</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Firecracker (Sharan)</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1459722@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Altering any item is NOT out of the question in my book. &#060;br /&#062;I am your height and have found I really like high-low hems--shorter in the front to create a longer leg line and longer in the back to get just the right amount of backside coverage. With your alterations, you could play around with the perfect combination. 
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>amiable on "Alter or no? EF Tunics"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/alter-or-no-ef-tunics#post-1459721</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>amiable</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1459721@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I say alter them - you know that you love the length and straight hem and shorter sleeves - those aren't difficult alterations, and would make you love your newer tunics even more.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>abc on "Alter or no? EF Tunics"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/alter-or-no-ef-tunics#post-1459716</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>abc</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1459716@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;One of my first EF items ever was a black, 3/4 sleeve scoop neck tunic. &#038;nbsp;It has just the right amount of structure at the shoulder and sleeve coupled with the signature flowy EF style bottom. &#038;nbsp;Find&#038;nbsp;1 below is this style. &#038;nbsp;It has a straight hem across the bottom. &#038;nbsp;Hands down my favorite tunic.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I wanted to duplicate this but the only EF tunic available at the time was Find 2. &#038;nbsp;There are slight differences:
&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;ul&#062;
&#060;li&#062;One, I think the scoop may not be as deep, offering less visible skin and (I think) less structure in the top. &#038;nbsp;&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;Long sleeves vs 3/4 is a difference (but I almost always scrunch so this is not an issue).&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;li&#062;The biggest difference to me is the hem type and length.&#060;/li&#062;
&#060;/ul&#062;
&#060;p&#062;The 2&#038;nbsp;most recent tunics I got (Find 2) are a little longer on me than the original (Find 1), and have a shirt-tail, high-low hem. &#038;nbsp;In my mind, they are hitting me a little long and throwing off my proportions. &#038;nbsp;I'm 5ft 5in and I feel like they're kind of swallowing me up, especially since I always wear them with flats and that won't be changing. &#038;nbsp;They look more like a dress than a tunic top.
&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Do you think it is gasp-worthy to shorten these EF items?&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Could I also cut off the sleeves to hit where the original ones hit?&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Or am I crazy thinking to modify EF?&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;It's not stopping me from wearing them, I just don't feel as fab in the 2 newer ones as I do the original, sadly.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Input greatly appreciated.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;ETA: &#038;nbsp;looking at the model pics, I DO now think sleeve length is playing into the overall feeling more than I thought. &#038;nbsp;So shortening the sleeves IS on the table now.&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	