<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<channel>
			<title>YouLookFab Forum &#187; Topic: Questions about tall sizes</title>
			<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/questions-about-tall-sizes</link>
			<description>Style Advice for Fashion Lovers</description>
			<language>en-US</language>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
			<textInput>
				<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
				<name>q</name>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/search.php</link>
			</textInput>
			<atom:link href="https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/rss/topic/questions-about-tall-sizes" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

				<item>
				<title>Anonymous on "Questions about tall sizes"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/questions-about-tall-sizes#post-101228</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">101228@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;BR and Gap add to the rise in tall sizes. Like AJ, I found that this addition to the rise fit weirdly on me - but a quick trip to the tailor fixed that, since I just needed to take the waistband in.&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Good luck!
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Amanda on "Questions about tall sizes"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/questions-about-tall-sizes#post-100493</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">100493@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Maya - I tried the Gap microcheck pants in tall because the regular ones didn't have enough length in the leg.  What I found (and what they told me on the phone) is that the tall sizing assumes that a person is both longer in the leg and in the torso.  All my height is in my legs and my torso is average.  I found that the tall pants fit me at the same place in the rise as the regulars, but were baggy in the crotch -- and I couldn't really pull them up in a way that made them fit properly.  It seemed that would have worked, but I remember that it didn't -- maybe because then the waistband was too big since they were designed to sit at the hips not the waist.  I didn't try sizing down so I can't say if that would have helped.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Maya on "Questions about tall sizes"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/questions-about-tall-sizes#post-100437</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Maya</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">100437@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;Good point. I wear a 2 regular so I guess I can't size down. Not sure when I'll get a chance to experiment with this but I definitely intend to at some point.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>marianne on "Questions about tall sizes"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/questions-about-tall-sizes#post-100408</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>marianne</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">100408@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I didn't size down, and I think they are just a tiny bit bigger than regulars. 2 is the smallest anyway, at least at BR.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Maya on "Questions about tall sizes"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/questions-about-tall-sizes#post-100406</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Maya</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">100406@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;That did answer the question Marianne. I would only get skinnies and straight legs in tall sizes since there is no defined knee break. Pants are less of a problem. For some reason pant rises seem to be higher or just fit differently somehow. &#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;Do you size down in talls? I size up when I try petites so I wonder if I should get the smallest size.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>marianne on "Questions about tall sizes"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/questions-about-tall-sizes#post-100404</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>marianne</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">100404@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;I haven't tried  any tall sizes at the Gap lately, but I did try BR. Yes, the rise is higher. But the proportions are also different, depending on the cut. For example, I bought a pair of white high-waisted skinnies from BR, which are actually straight legs. I think you would really like the rise on those, and the pant leg is pretty much the same width throughout, so it doesn't matter much where your knee is. However, I tried some Martin pants in a tall size, and the fit was really wrong in many ways - roomier in the thighs, and the seat was kinda weird, etc. I can't imagine that you would need a tall size,but I hope that answers the question somewhat.  <span aria-hidden="true" class="emoticon emoticon-smile icon-emoticon-smile "></span> 
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
				<item>
				<title>Maya on "Questions about tall sizes"</title>
				<link>https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/topic/questions-about-tall-sizes#post-100396</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<dc:creator>Maya</dc:creator>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">100396@https://youlookfab.com/welookfab/</guid>
				<description>&#060;p&#062;The post about being &#034;petite but not&#034; got me thinking about possibly trying a tall size next time I buy bottoms from BR. I know that sounds laughable since I am basically a dwarf at 5'2, but I thought it might give me extra length in the rise and since I only buy straight leg bottoms, hemming 6&#034; shouldn't change the silhouette much. However, when I checked Gap's tall size guide, it indicates that the waistband is LOWER than regular sizes? What the...&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;&#060;a href=&#034;http://www.gap.com/browse/category.do?cid=48054&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034;&#062;http://www.gap.com/browse/category.do?cid=48054&#060;/a&#062;&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;I know for petites, they make the rise shorter. So it would stand to reason that the tall rise would be longer...but I guess not? So I am wondering: Is this true and for what reason does it make sense? Are the waistband placement and rise two different things? I think they are since the petite size guide indicates a higher waistband but a lower rise. I'm thoroughly confused now...&#060;/p&#062;
&#060;p&#062;And, are BR bottoms the same way? I can't find information about the rise specifically on their site.
&#060;/p&#062;
</description>
			</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
	