OR

Why the Smallest Clothing Sizes are Understocked

Sizes XS and S (sizes 0 to 4 in the US) are surprisingly fast selling sizes. More often than not, soon after a sale starts the smallest sizes are in short supply or no longer available, and sale racks are full of sizes M and L. This doesn’t make sense, when the most bought shopping sizes* are usually between an American size 6 and 10. Logically, those are the sizes that should sell out first. Why is this not the case? The reason is quite logical and it takes me back to my fashion buying days – fashion buyers deliberately understock the smallest sizes.

Fashion Buyers are responsible for selecting the items and sizes that sell in a store. They will order in a style from a manufacturer over a very carefully distributed size curve. When they place the order it makes sense to order more of the sizes that are popular, and fewer of the other sizes. So for example, buyers bulk up the order in sizes 6 to 10 because those are the most shopped sizes. That way the store can make the most profit AND offer the most correct size to their customers.

The thing is that they don’t create the size curve to exactly match the popularity of sizes. They order a little less of the unpopular sizes and a little more of the popular sizes. To understand why they do this, consider what happens in practice:

A clothing order hits stores with a full complement of sizes. As the style is purchased, fewer of the sizes become available thereby adjusting the size curve. Because the smaller sizes are intentionally under stocked, they sell out faster than larger sizes (of which there is often two to three times as much quantity). Retailers are happier to sit with an over stocked set of larger sizes than smaller sizes because as time passes by, they have a better chance of selling the larger sizes at any price (full or discounted). Since the most bought shopping sizes are larger than an XS or S, holding surpluses of the larger sizes is less risky at any time of the year.

The bottom line is that they know that their size curve is somewhat of a guess. And they would prefer to err on the low side for less popular sizes and on the high side for more popular sizes. First, one extra item in a popular size is easier to sell, and second, even if they don’t sell it a popular size is easier to sell on down the value chain to a discounter.

That’s why places like TJ Maxx and the Rack are full of size M and L, and sizes 6 to 10. That’s why the smallest sizes are the first to go at Nordstrom Anniversary Sale time. Ever wonder why many thrift and consignment stores are full of sizes 6 to 10? Now you know.

*Note: The most shopped clothing sizes in the US are NOT the same as the average clothing sizes of American women. They are, in fact, a different set of sizes. The average clothing sizes of American women are 12 and 14, yet the most shopped sizes are smaller than that. A topic for another day!

Comment RSS

86 Comments on...
Why the Smallest Clothing Sizes are Understocked

Good explanation! I always have this problem, but never stopped to think why it might be so.

Presumably they do this with the 12s/14s also, and that is why Anthropologie is always out of my size?

Interesting post! I’m on the high end of this spectrum (10/12) so don’t normally have too much trouble finding sizes. Now shoes are another kettle of fish. Size 10 is often difficult to find. Is it the same for smaller sizes?

Doesn’t seem to happen in Australia – everything seems to be in the small sizes 8-10 and all the regular/larger sizes 12 and up are gone! Of maybe its just me shopping in a small town – indicative of the population’s average size!?

Thanks for this fascinating, excellent post! I’m on the smaller end of the size spectrum and have wondered this for years. Over time I’ve learned to start snapping things up in my size at the beginning of the season, and it’s great to know the logical reason behind this.

This explains a lot. I’ve been suspecting that small sized women are ones who keep the stores going by having to pay full price. Some stores here have stopped carrying XS at all, especially in regular (not petite) sizes. For example, I like the Nygaard brand at Dillards but can only get an XS in the Petite department, and need an XS regular.

I knew they carried less smaller sizes because there were less small size women, but didn’t realize they purposely understock. Makes sense.

Angie, I have always suspected this, especially after working in retail and witnessing the scant numbers of smaller sizes first hand. I time my trips to T J Maxx, one of my favorite stores, on the day(s) when new merchandise arrives. And because sizing varies greatly, I can sometimes wear a medium in a top or dress, even though I usually need a small (4).

When shopping online, I ALWAYS buy multiples of size small tees in my favorite colors.

This makes a lot of sense, but still makes me want to softly slap clothing buyers. Maybe the store doesn’t carry as many S and XS, but when I hear stores only carry 1 or 2, in the smaller sizes, come on! Give people a chance to purchase the smaller size at least! Even more frustrating is when the smaller size is on the mannequin and the sales associate confirms the only one left is the one in the window but won’t give it up to purchase anyway. I understand that they are not as easy to assemble and reassemble but maybe the mannequins should be larger and wear a larger size then. This way they are not holding hostage one of the few precious smaller sized pieces.

I would not have guessed this problem from my shopping experience. I usually in between sizes M and L (10/12 US) and every time I shop it feels that stores are full of XS / S sizes and do not have enough of M and L. Most of sizes on the sale rack are either small or extra large – at least where I shop…or maybe it just seems this way to me because these are the sizes I need? :-)
However I found another factor which may contribute to this problem: sometimes sizes seem to grow up. This Saturday I was amazed at the Danier when I needed XS in one type of jacket and S in another – me with my size 10! Talk about vanity sizes…

fascinating! So if you are smaller sized, you really need to be shopping earlier in the season….what good information to have. Thanks for sharing your insight, Angie!

A timely post indeed. Couldn’t find the shorts I wanted in my size (2) at the ATL sale this weekend. Now I know why. I also need to rethink my “wait for sale” strategy. If I love it and it fits, I need to buy.
Thanks, Angie, for the insider info!

How interesting! As a dedicated sale shopper, I guess I am lucky that I usually fall right smack in the middle of the most popular size range (8)!

Does this also explain why I can never find an XL?

Most L’s are just a little too tight and I would love an XL and never ever find them.

I completely understand the logic behind this.

That doesn’t make it any less annoying, though.

I feel immense pressure to buy something I love when I find it because if I wait for it to go on sale, I know that I’ll most likely be out of luck.

What I find odd is that whenever I’m at H&M, I see SO MANY size 32′s! Often that’s the only size left, and there will be several of them–sometimes 5 or more on the sale rack! I fundamentally do not understand why H&M always seems to overbuy 32′s. My size by comparison, always seems to be the first to go (36)–and I am usually well below the average both in terms of size and sales. If they bought half as many 32′s and twice as many 36′s you would think they would sell MORE. I’m sure there’s a reason for it but I can’t figure out what the reason is.

I am guessing that this is because stores skew their size ranges based on their target market, and H&M’s average customer is perhaps smaller than usual. This is surprising to me, I guess, because I read that budget stores tend to skew larger than average (which is why I can never fit into Target’s Merona line, even though I like a lot of their stuff–the smallest size is too big). But maybe it’s because H&M customers are younger so the sizing is more juniors-y. I guess I answered my own question, didn’t I?

Fashion buying/marketing fascinates me, and learning more about it has helped me avoid a lot of misplaced resentment that other women have towards the industry. Yes, it’s frustrating, but in the end it’s unreasonable for a store to make decisions based on what is “fair” and PC rather than what is just good business sense.

I used to have an aversion to paying full price. Now this explains why there was never anything left in my size (4P) when I did wait for a sale. I would leave stores upset and frustrated, always feeling like there was something wrong with me for not being able to find the perfect pieces at the end of the season or cycle. My shopping philosophy is changing. I am starting to buy more pieces at full price – if it’s a 10++, I grab it!

Every year I used to start shopping for summer sundresses in July or August. Now I see why there was never anything left in the stores for me. I’m not making this mistake again! I have several summer dresses on order now, even thought it is still just above freezing here.

Cynthia and Dianne, the size 14 (XL) is an interesting size because it’s often available across two department areas – regular and plus. The plus sized 14 fits a little roomier than a regular sized 14 though. The size should be widely available, and in my shopping experiences it is. Perhaps not at Anthropologie? You are right about the same analogy applying to a size 12.

Maya, precisely right. Merchandisers distribute skewed size curves to different target markets. At our Seattle H&M’s the smallest sizes definitely run out first – same with all the retailers actually.

Lisa, as frustrating as it is, as an ex-fashion buyer I think it’s a good size curve strategy. Retailers cannot sit with reams of sizes in the least popular sizes – they would go out of business. As far as undressing mannequins goes, there is no excuse! You should be able to purchase a style off a mannequin if you want to.

Yublocka, I am unfamiliar with the footwear size curve strategy. It might be different.

Anette, your reasoning sounds spot on.

Great explanation, Angie. It’s perfectly logical, yet most people wouldn’t stop to think about this. My fellow plus-sizers who constantly rail about the superior selection their slender sisters enjoy would do well to read this.
Can’t wait to read your post on why the most shopped size doesn’t correlate with the most common one!

This is very intereesting. Thanks for the info.

That makes perfect sense now that you explain it. Thanks for the insight. It’s all about dollars and cents!

This is such a fascinating subject!

I’m curious why the most shopped sizes are not the average sizes.. people buy a smaller size or the smaller size women buy more clothes?

You would have a ball at the H&M I usually shop at, Angie (I am guessing you are a 32). Typically I see a slew of 32s, a couple of 34′s, and then a ton of 40′s and 42′s.

When I went to buy my polkadot dress, I snagged the last 34. There were probably 10-15 32′s, and just one 34. I lucked out because I do not normaly wear a 34 at H&M–but this happened to be a good fit.

I know I’m not crazy because I shop at LOTS of H&Ms, across two different states, and I only ever see this at one store. The scarcity of 36′s is always an issue no matter which store I go to, but the abundance of 32′s is unique to this one store. I didn’t even know there was a 32 for the longest time, until I shopped at this store. I wonder why that is.

Thank you for the explanation. Very interesting (and annoying all at once).

It makes me sad, but it does make sense.

What doesn’t make sense is why Gap’s new denim comes in lengths for every size except 0.
*shakes fist at the sky*

It’s great to finally know the full explanation. When I was much younger, I thought the reason might be that smaller people shopped more :P

Wow, I think it works in a different way here in Spain. I used to have a lot of problems to buy things on sale when I was an L size (American M), but now that I am an S/M, I have no problems at all. On sales period, the popular sizes are XXS, XS and S, and then XL. So really, the ones who have the problem are ‘normal’ sized women. I still have problems with tops because I am a Medium size, so 20 pounds less and I’m still on the same boat lol As for regular selling periods, I believe it stays the same. Shops cater mostly for very small women, at least at the shops I regularly visit (INDITEX Group, MANGO, BLANCO, SPRINGFIELD…) I did realize things were different in the UK though, sizes went up to really big numbers (compared to Spain).

I usually find a abundance of small and extra small at the few ‘trendier’ stores I shop at and rarely find a xl at those stores- NY&Co and Cache especially….interesting article, btw

Lisa, I have been known (more than once!) to ask sales associates to remove a garment from a mannequin if it’s a small. In fact, most of the time, the mannequin is ‘wearing’ a small!

This makes perfect sense! I guess sthat’s why I always find something I can’t live without at TJMaxx and Marshalls-sometimes being a size 10 is a good thing!

That’s interesting! Great background info.
I have to admit as a solid size 8/M I benefit from this system and am not complaining. But I can see that it must be frustrating for women with smaller sizes to have a limited selection, and to feel more pressure to nab things early when they come out.

Also, I often get the feeling that Spanish sizing is just ridiculous. Most young women I see on the streets, unless they are thin, wear ill-fitting clothes because, this is my guess, they can’t find their own size. But of course, if sometimes I have to wear a Large size (and XL is the largest you can find) and people insist that I am skinny and that maybe I could pile a couple of kilos, I can’t see how a regular size woman would fit in such clothes. And then we are the first ones to insist that our models should be at a healthy weight, which is sort of funny. They worry about the models but not about the young women in the streets.

GREAT article! I love knowing the little details behind the scenes of the shopping world. I’m definitely the person who always asks “why”, even though it may have nothing to do with me.

More articles like this!!! :)

You go, Barbara. I also always ask the SA to get the garment off the mannequin for my clients.

Airin. I have no idea what’s going on with size curves in Spain :(

Antje, we have talked about this before and you benefit 100% from this retail strategy.

Michelle, I guess the grass isn’t always greener on the other side.

Maya, I believe you. Yes, I wear an H&M size 32 and would have a field day at your H&Ms. I wonder if there are lots of small size inter-store transfers to NYC H&Ms? That could be the reason.

Rute, you are on the right track.

Fascinating! Thanks for this insider’s information!

The sizing curve makes total sense, but in my experience I never have trouble finding small sizes on sale. I’m sure part of it is based on store and region, but when I go to Nordstrom, Saks, Bloomingdales, etc., I have fantastic luck finding 2s and 4s on sale, and actually see even more 0s on sale than the other sizes. Maybe the buyers here skew toward a smaller client base, but it works for me.

From my experience, shoe retailers take the same approach. They stock much more in the most common sizes so they are not stuck with a glut of very small/very large sizes that there is a limited market for.

For this very reason I must pay full price more than I like to…grab it when I see my size. But I totally understand it having worked for Ann Taylor I usually have to order my size on line…they rarely receive any of my size in store:(
Thanks for the insight:)

Interesting there is a difference between the most common sizes and the most bought. I wonder if the women in the larger sizes are waiting to lose weight before they buy. Just a thought.

Thanks for this explanation! The lack of smalls and x-smalls has driven me crazy as I’ve started trying to find clothes that really fit (as opposed to almost fit).

And I’ve had an epiphany about my shopping aversion- it is very frustrating to shop when your size is so limited in availability. I bet if a store became known as stocking smalls and x-smalls (not petites) they would have us flocking to it.

Very interesting. I’ve been a range of sizes 6-10 over the years and always had enormous luck at discount stores.This explains why. :)

That makes sense, Angie, because that polkadot dress was months old when I bought it. Debora’s daughter wore it to the YLF gathering on my birthday last year, in March, and I think I picked it up in May? That’s a LONG turnaround for H&M, where things often come and go in a matter of days. Those dresses must have just been leftovers that weren’t selling at other stores. Interesting.

And here is the article! Thanks Angie — I was totally interested in why this happens. It makes a lot of sense, although I still don’t like it. :-)

One thing I’ve got going for me here in Vancouver is the ethnic distribution of the population. We have a lot of people of Asian descent here, and they tend to be comparatively small and slender. For that reason we get a skew toward smaller sizes. They still run out of size S and XS, but they still get way more of these sizes than they would in most of the rest of the country. A sales associate told me recently (when I was buying an XS winter coat) that the Edmonton store ships all their small sizes to Vancouver at the end of the season.

This completely makes sense, thank you for explaining it so thoroughly, Angie. Very curious to read that next post, I’m quite puzzled about that.

Also, after reading this post and Airin’s comments, I am wondering if this is a regional thing: over here M & L (and sometimes XL) are the first sizes to go, the sales are always full of XS & S (size 32 to 36). Not sure why that is?

Angie, thanks for taking the time to explain this. It seems like they could stock a bit more of 0-4 if they’re always selling out. While the overall explanation makes sense, why not stock some more since there are a bunch of us who often don’t find the size we need and are willing to pay full price for it if need be. You’d think they would collect data on this and adjust their stocks. But I guess it’s hard for them to know how many people were turned away because their size wasn’t there.

Thank you so much for filling us in on the reason behind the lack of small sizes, Angie. You’ve talked about this issue before (referring to NAS, I think?) so it’s great to understand why. Makes perfect business sense and helps me a lot as a consumer to figure out my shopping strategies.

I’m glad it makes sense, ladies.

Precisely, Sihaya. Your solution initially makes sense but it’s just not as simple as that from a retail point of view. It’s actually less risky to ship the right size to the customer (bless America for doing that!), or get clever with inter branch transfers.

Sinead, that’s why retailers who are prepared to ship your size to you for free do so well. Thank you Nordstrom and Talbots!

Inge, that’s very interesting! This is not my Euro sale shopping experience. Unlike America, sale time in Europe only occurs twice a year (end of season). All I ever see are racks of middle sizes. Isn’t that weird? Perhaps things are different in Belgium – or you’re seeing sale stuff only after the inter branch transfers. I’d love to know , and you should come shopping in America. We’d roll the red carpet out for you :)

Steph, you are hitting all the right stores that effectively do inter branch transfers in your favoured sizes. Lucky you :)

Maya, now that makes perfect retail sense.

Taylor, like you I nab my size asap. A gal has got to do what a gal has got to do.

Brings me back to my buying days in retail… where we were taught to buy on this scale:
1-2-3-3-2-1, so there would be one size 4 and one size 14. OR we’d drop the ones and go 2-4-4-2, with no fringe sizes.

I loved the lines we had the freedom to buy as we choose, and could shift upwards or downwards depending on the style.
And I must confess as a 4P at the time I would tack on an extra in that size if I knew I was planning on buying the item LOL!

So not everything on the discount rack has been run over by a shopping cart ;+)

Love the insider info–very interesting—-always ready to read more! Thanks Angie!

I suppose my perception is skewed because I don’t wear a small size, but it seems to me that the sale racks around here (particularly at Anthropologie) are FULL of 0s and 2s. As for shoes, I, along with apparently vast hordes of other people, wear a size 9 and it is ALWAYS, ALWAYS sold out IMMEDIATELY. Size 7 always seems to be abundant.

My real question is why the store cannot simply reorder an item in specific sizes.

Very interesting insider information.

Well at least I know now that I am not crazy. I tend to nab things full price for this very reason. I have also bought things off the mannequin before or at least tried them on.

Very interesting information – and I totally understand it – it all about what sells and if I were a shop owner I’d be doing the same thing. HowEVER as someone who wears the small sizes, I can’t begin to describe how many times I am disappointed when I shop the sales or the discount stores and can never find my size. Right now, I am SYC – and I’ve just kind of resolved myself to the fact that once I do start shopping again that most spring items that fit me will be gone! Boo!

I’m currently about a 14 and it’s actually not that easy of a size to find. I wear a Misses 14 because I have a narrower waist. Even a Misses will need bringing in at the waistline, so the Plus 14 is cut far too straight for my figure. Maybe it’s because I insist on shopping in stores like Anthropologie though? I’m in a college town and my local Anthro rarely carries over a medium in many dresses and tops, unless the large and x-large sell out immediately. I see a lot of 0, 2, and 4 there and very little over a size 8. I think 14 is actually a tough size because a lot of trendier stores consider it too big of a size to carry, while plus stores consider a Misses 14 too small.

I had the same perception that my size was harder to find when I was a 12 and a 10 though. I think it’s common to remember the time the store did not have your size, and not to remember the time it did. There’s also seemingly size snobbery at play in some small boutiques. I have been to some that will not stock a double digit size at all. It frustrates me especially because I’m tall with a very large frame. Even when I get my body lean as can be, I still need a 10 or so for my shoulders. While I understand a small business might want to cater to its customer base, it’s aggravating to get the message that anyone wanting to wear trendy clothes better be an 8 or smaller. That may be a realistic size for shorter or smaller-boned women, but it’s not a realistic size for me.

This makes a lot of sense! The lack of small sizes is a big problem for me…I’m often very limited in what I can buy from thrift stores because of my small size. I end up paying full price a lot since if I wait for the sale, everything in my size will be sold out!

Thanks for the explanation :)

Yes, Angie, I was going to mention (I hit submit too soon) that I’m so grateful for Nordstrom’s help in finding and shipping the right size to me. Glad to know Talbot’s does that too- I wasn’t aware of that, so I’ll have to give them a try again.

I understand why a store might stock only a couple of their smallest size, but I hate the policy Taylor alluded to above: some stores don’t their smallest size in their storefronts, period, as a matter of policy. It’s only available online. (That may be true for their largest size as well?)

When this is the case, then I think that size should always ship for free since the only way it can be tried on is to buy it online.

Hrm, maybe it is because I thrift in large cities near colleges/universities, but I never have a hard time finding small sizes secondhand. Yes, there are plenty of larger sizes, but it has always seemed an even mix.

However, I do notice that the hottest shoes I see when thrifting are always a size 5 or 6. Sad panda.

Size small ladies, how frustrating for you. I can emphasize because I have a narrow foot and always have to buy expensive shoes at full price right when they come out or they will sell out in my size. I can only imagine how frustrating it would be having to do this with clothes.

Angie, as far as shoes are concerned, 8 (Euro 39) is the most popular size and sometimes difficult to find. Like clothes, I nab them when I find them! And I buy duplicates of favorites whenever possible.

Ahhh. So that’s why. Being at the smallest end of the spectrum myself it’s rare to find my sizes in stock when an item is on sale, much to my disappointment. I thought it was just my bad luck. Like many of you I have learned to grab what I like when I see it in my size because I know it will literally be gone the next day.

Ah and suddenly things are a little clearer, it definitely makes sense the curve would be altered to meet the target market, as are the sizes themselves. I guess I’m lucky to be a well stocked size!

I guess it must be the same in Australia. I’m a 0/XS/Australian 6, and I so rarely find anything on sale – in fact, I often have trouble finding things full price!

This is fascinating, but it definitely explains why I am often frustrated by trying to find things in my size! Thanks, Angie!!

I have a couple of small friends and I know that it is difficult for them to find clothes in their sizes in the store. As much as I am a large (size and height) person and it blows my mind that anyone is a size 0, I can empathize with their frustration in not finding sizes.

In fact, I find this same phenomenon all the time in plus-size stores. Want to find a size 14 (the smallest they carry) at Lane Bryant? You better be prepared to pay full price and maybe buy online, and as for the sale racks, forget about it. I think there are two factors at work in this case – one, the same as Angie identified, and second that there are more 14′s than 26′s out there in the world.

Malcontent, I think part of the issue may be indeed that you are shopping at places like Anthropologie, but stores that go to a larger size may skew too ‘old’ style-wise for you. That no-man’s land between misses’ and plus is treacherous, I know, although it’s better than it used to be.

I do find it easier, even in thrift and second-hand stores, to find sizes 16 and 18 than I did 14 and 12 when I was a bit smaller – size 14 seems to always go the fastest, at least in the size range I look at – I don’t pay attention to anything in single digits since it doesn’t affect me. I’d love to get down to a size 10 because it seems like the most frequently-seen size left on the rack, but I suspect that not even my bones are that small…

I totally can’t wear 14s from the plus department, Angie — they are cut for someone with way more boob and belly than I have and look baggy even when they technically fit. I am large-framed and I tend to have “misses” proportions, even when I go up to a size 16 or 18 (now there’s the mythical questing beast…a misses-proportioned, but size 16 garment…thank heavens for J. Jill when I was fatter).

Anyway, yeah, I was in Anthro the other night and happened to hit upon a skirt which was one of the few where I needed a 14 instead of a 12. They told me they only ever stock one 14. Which, hello, the US average size is what?

I thought about it some more, and you have a point there, Angie. Our sales are in January and July and last for one month. The shops start with 20 to 30% off, and I think I was a bit quick to draw conclusions. Most sizes are usually still available then, it’s when we get to the good stuff (i.e. 50 to 70% off, usually during the last two weeks, or even just the last week), that we are down to XS and S.

So, you fly over for that last week of sales to snap up some good stuff here, and I want to start packing right now to come shop with you in the US!!

P.S. The most common shoe sizes in Belgium are 38 and 39 (I have shoes in both sizes), so you really need to act fast if you want to find those on sale.

I disagree. I always see S and XS (sizes 2 and 4) on the racks in department stores, and I always had a hard time to find my size. Tens and twelves are first to be sold out.

Here it seems to be more the opposite – at least at TJMaxx – with fewer 8-12 or M, L on the clearance racks than 4-6. Same seems to go for a lot of places in the mall.

But I have noticed it differs from store to store. If I go to Kmart, the Mediums and 10-12 sizes seem to have more on the clearance racks (yes, very select clothes from kmart aren’t bad.)

My biggest annoyance in the last couple of years size wise, at least locally, is that I can’t seem to find bras in my size even when it’s not a clearance item. Even at VS they don’t seem to have any in a tshirt bra (I don’t want the fushia lace thing that’s going to look horrible under a shirt.)

Well! I have learned something new today! This makes a lot of sense, i am a size small and typically wear a 4 and i notice this most with online shopping. Sometimes i can go in store and find my size still but it seems like my size always sells out fairly quickly on the store’s online site. And I never find anything good clothing wise @ TJMaxx or Marshalls *pouts*

The comments about the last garment in a small size often being on the store mannequin are so dead on it’s not even funny. There’s something about publicly undressing a mannequin and making off with her clothes that definitely feels weird at first… but it’s happened enough times now that I’m starting to get used to it ;-)

Kristine, when that size small blouse you MUST have is on the mannequin, well, sometimes you have to resort to drastic measures!

I worked in retail as both an associate AND a buyer, so I have no qualms about doing this! Believe me, that mannequin is NOT going to complain. At all……

LOL

Many a mannequin has been stripped for my clothing… and I don’t think itwill stop in the future.

I have noticed this very discouraging trend :( I want clothes too! Not my fault ‘m little.

Ah, thanks for chiming back in, Inge. That makes sense! So at sale time, I need to pop over to Europe and you need to shop here. Lots of tea and cake awaits us.

Rhubarb girl, that was a very insightful comment. Thank you.

April, I agree that stores should at the very least carry the sizes that they stock online – even if it means one size 00 and 16 per store.

Cynthia, I hear you. A Missus size 14 and 16 is cut differently to a plus size 14 and 16. Anthropologie just demonstrated that they would rather stock the most shopped sizes in America – as opposed to the average size.

On footwear, I don’t know what the most shopped sizes are, but a US size 9 is the average footwear size of American women.

Thanks for the lesson!

A stock-out too early is money left on the table, though. Period. So I would say that ANY size running out too quickly, especially consistently, is an opportunity to make money.

Many retailers are turning to software and statistics to help them right-size what tends to be a judgement call by many offices. But, fashion retail is a slow-moving beast when it comes to technology…sadly.

Ooooh, now I get it! All the more reason to shop early and not to dither over an item!

Excellent post! As a small size within a special size (XXSP/00P, I’m VERY short), I see my size sell out so quickly, it makes my head spin. If something catches my fancy, I have to snatch it up right away, and either pay full price, or sweat it out waiting for a coupon code. Thank you for breaking down this phenomenon into such an easily understandable way.

This same phenomenon is also seen with special sizes (petites and plus-size) versus standard sizes, with the added frustration of less color/variety choices. One or two colors for special sizes, but then hop over to the same garment in the standard sizes reveals the full spectrum of colors. Less stock of garments + less variety choice = one very annoyed petite shopper!

I’m not so sure. I buy (mostly men’s) for a small store and more often than not, they are prepacked and we are unable to pick our sizes. Lately we’ve been unable to get as many of the smaller sizes and are stuck with leftover larges and extra larges.

Having worked in fashion retail for the last 6 yrs., something I have witnessed is that the employees may be buying up certain sizes before the item even hits the ‘floor’. At the boutique I currently work at all 12 employees wear a size 6 or smaller. I know that if a ‘to-die-for’item comes in on my day off even I am out of luck (employees are not allowed the free shipping option on out of stock items that customers can receive). Also, as a side note, when I worked for a cosmetic company at a dept. store , We received limited edition items for the major seasons,( spring, summer,fall,holiday) and quite often these 3 or 6 quantities would all be dept. employee purchases. So maybe ‘insiders’ at you favorite haunts have something to do with it?

Missmillie, it really ticks me off when stores allow their employees to clean out a section before customers can get to it. That’s not the way a retail store should be run. I agree with stores that have a week wait policy for employees to buy new arrivals or a three-day wait policies on new clearance additions. Some stores also only allow employees to buy clothes at the very end of the day before close.

It’s the same with shoes. Out of brands that DO carry size 5, they’re almost ALWAYS gone. Makes it difficult to shop sales, because the only ones left are usually really ugly.

I keep on hearing about tiny sizes always being available. Not here in Toronto (lots of Asian women with money to spend)! I guess everyone orders the same number of sizes, which means that areas with a smaller percentage of say, Asians, will have tons of 0s, 2s and 4s left while places like Toronto or San Fran will have few!

Angie- Great post, and I see the reasoning for brick and mortar stores, but what about online storefronts?

I get how retailers in brick and mortar stores may want to stock carefully and avoid having too much of small sizes because – who knows if an XXSP or 00P customer will come in to that specific store location and buy it? But online…many women of extended sizing (I am very petite, so I frequently have to shop online for online-only sizing) flock to online storefronts to find their special size, so I’m not sure why more of those special sizes are not stocked more. I’d understand if my size is only occasionally amongst the first to sell out, but it seems to happen EVERY time. In my opinion, those retailers are definitely missing out on sales.

Hi Angie- had to comment on this post! What you are saying is so very true; I own a boutique in Australia, and this is exactly how I plan my buying,even though I buy on a much smaller scale than the big department stores!
In Australia, our smallest sizes are generally 8 and 10, not sure how that relates to your sizing,( I never could work that out), and, unfortunately for those smaller people, I can’t afford to stock much ( if any) in those sizes.
My most popular, and fastest selling sizes, are Aussie sizes14 and 16, so those are the ones I stock up on when buying- of course, it all relates to the fact that women ( my market is 40+) are generally bigger these days, and they’re the ones I’m going to buy for!
I love your blog, I find the posts quite inspiring, and always look forward to new ones.

Lovely of you to chime in, Bodie! Thanks for the validation and compliments. 00 is the smallest size in the US if that helps.

PetiteAsianGirl, as far as I know, buyers do not differeentiate between online and in store purchases.

Not all retailers sell more of the larger sizes. Which sizes sell out more quickly depends on the target customer demographic.
The question remains, if retailers consistently sell out of certain sizes, why don’t they order fewer of those to begin with? One would assume that the goal of all businesses is to sell their products at the highest possible price the market will bear.
Is the implication that there is an advantage to having a well-stocked sales section? And if so, what might that be?

Oops.
Change the first sentence of my second paragraph to read: The question remains, if retailers consistently put more of certain sizes on sale, why don’t they order fewer of those to begin with?

Leave a Comment


OR