<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The semantics of hosiery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/</link>
	<description>Look fab, feel fabulous.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:36:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/comment-page-1/#comment-38699</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/#comment-38699</guid>
		<description>I think pantyhose are the sexiest thing on the planet. I wish women would wear them everyday. it&#039;s nice to hear women talking about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think pantyhose are the sexiest thing on the planet. I wish women would wear them everyday. it&#8217;s nice to hear women talking about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/comment-page-1/#comment-38690</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/#comment-38690</guid>
		<description>Good question, Ana (sort of suspected that Brendan would say “laddering”  :-)). 

Fishnets are sheer and see-through so I’d call them hose, which is a type of hosiery. Fishnets that are backed with nylon fall into the pukka pantyhose category and would therefore be called hose too. Fishnets are too sheer to be tights. Does that make sense? 

No hate mail yet, Sal and hope that your reader got sorted! 

*chuckle* Kristers. Have a super New Year too. 

Nicole, I trend to say “opaques” as well and those are a good example of tights. Crazy how the description of something can become it’s name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question, Ana (sort of suspected that Brendan would say “laddering”  <img src='http://youlookfab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ). </p>
<p>Fishnets are sheer and see-through so I’d call them hose, which is a type of hosiery. Fishnets that are backed with nylon fall into the pukka pantyhose category and would therefore be called hose too. Fishnets are too sheer to be tights. Does that make sense? </p>
<p>No hate mail yet, Sal and hope that your reader got sorted! </p>
<p>*chuckle* Kristers. Have a super New Year too. </p>
<p>Nicole, I trend to say “opaques” as well and those are a good example of tights. Crazy how the description of something can become it’s name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/comment-page-1/#comment-38685</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/#comment-38685</guid>
		<description>This is excellent clarification!  Thanks Angiepie!

My husband has an old friend whose nick name is Panty Ho!  (don&#039;t ask)

We always used the term &quot;nylons&quot; for any kind of sheer pantyhose.  And &quot;knee-highs&quot; were nylons that stopped at the knee.

The word &quot;tights&quot; conjures up thoughts of little girls in dresses.  So I always feel funny using the word &quot;tights&quot; when referring to my opaques.  (which is why I tend to call them &quot;opaques&quot;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is excellent clarification!  Thanks Angiepie!</p>
<p>My husband has an old friend whose nick name is Panty Ho!  (don&#8217;t ask)</p>
<p>We always used the term &#8220;nylons&#8221; for any kind of sheer pantyhose.  And &#8220;knee-highs&#8221; were nylons that stopped at the knee.</p>
<p>The word &#8220;tights&#8221; conjures up thoughts of little girls in dresses.  So I always feel funny using the word &#8220;tights&#8221; when referring to my opaques.  (which is why I tend to call them &#8220;opaques&#8221;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristers</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/comment-page-1/#comment-38662</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/#comment-38662</guid>
		<description>&quot;Stockings actually refer to the thigh-high hose that are held in place with garter belts. I can assure you that I did not wear those to school.&quot;

Yes, but think of how many dates you would have gotten if you had!  :-)

Thanks for the clarification and have a great New Year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Stockings actually refer to the thigh-high hose that are held in place with garter belts. I can assure you that I did not wear those to school.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, but think of how many dates you would have gotten if you had!  <img src='http://youlookfab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for the clarification and have a great New Year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/comment-page-1/#comment-38659</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/#comment-38659</guid>
		<description>Angie, you crack me up. I hope you weren&#039;t getting hate mail about this. ;) Sent my readers your way for apple-shaped-figure advice today, BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie, you crack me up. I hope you weren&#8217;t getting hate mail about this. <img src='http://youlookfab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Sent my readers your way for apple-shaped-figure advice today, BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/comment-page-1/#comment-38655</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/#comment-38655</guid>
		<description>Brendan says laddering too.  :D  

So, are micro-fishnet hosiery--are those a form of tights, or a form of hose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brendan says laddering too.  <img src='http://youlookfab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>So, are micro-fishnet hosiery&#8211;are those a form of tights, or a form of hose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/comment-page-1/#comment-38653</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/#comment-38653</guid>
		<description>Hilarious! Thanks for the morning giggle, Sheila.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilarious! Thanks for the morning giggle, Sheila.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila W.</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/comment-page-1/#comment-38652</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/12/30/the-semantics-of-hosiery/#comment-38652</guid>
		<description>As a funny aside to this, when I worked in a clothing store that sold pantyhose (nylons), my coworker refered to them as, &quot;Two pairs of pantyhose, one pantyho&quot; (!). I didn&#039;t have the nerve to correct her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a funny aside to this, when I worked in a clothing store that sold pantyhose (nylons), my coworker refered to them as, &#8220;Two pairs of pantyhose, one pantyho&#8221; (!). I didn&#8217;t have the nerve to correct her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
