<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Volume overload</title>
	<atom:link href="http://youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/</link>
	<description>Look fab, feel fabulous.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:15:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: youlookfab &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mid-season rant</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-17431</link>
		<dc:creator>youlookfab &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mid-season rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/#comment-17431</guid>
		<description>[...] An abundance of wide-legged pants. Most of the silhouettes are too wide and clown-like. What’s worse is that wide-legged pants are selling alongside voluminous tunics which encourages them to be worn together. This is not a good look. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An abundance of wide-legged pants. Most of the silhouettes are too wide and clown-like. What’s worse is that wide-legged pants are selling alongside voluminous tunics which encourages them to be worn together. This is not a good look. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-16419</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/#comment-16419</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen pants like this in Spiegel’s catalogue frequently over the past couple of months, and repeatedly thought that a woman would have to be at least 6 foot tall to pull off the look. On me, at a petite 5&#039;2&#039;&#039;, they would look ridiculous. They have always been paired with fitted tops though. Add a swing top (especially in the same color) to the huge wide legged pants and it looks positively laughable even on the model. It&#039;s a shame that stores are displaying clothes in this way; no wonder the general public is so confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen pants like this in Spiegel’s catalogue frequently over the past couple of months, and repeatedly thought that a woman would have to be at least 6 foot tall to pull off the look. On me, at a petite 5&#8242;2&#8221;, they would look ridiculous. They have always been paired with fitted tops though. Add a swing top (especially in the same color) to the huge wide legged pants and it looks positively laughable even on the model. It&#8217;s a shame that stores are displaying clothes in this way; no wonder the general public is so confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cathy</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-16098</link>
		<dc:creator>cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/#comment-16098</guid>
		<description>Well not to be rude but Oprah is constantly gaining and losing weight.  Of course she would love volume.  I&#039;m noticing a lot of people wearing volume who maybe shouldn&#039;t. Overall it seems like a trend that only a select few understand.  Most of the mainstream public isn&#039;t keeping up with the watershed stuff and does not have a clue what is going on.  I won&#039;t say who, since that would be too rude.  (hint hint, they all watch Oprah)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well not to be rude but Oprah is constantly gaining and losing weight.  Of course she would love volume.  I&#8217;m noticing a lot of people wearing volume who maybe shouldn&#8217;t. Overall it seems like a trend that only a select few understand.  Most of the mainstream public isn&#8217;t keeping up with the watershed stuff and does not have a clue what is going on.  I won&#8217;t say who, since that would be too rude.  (hint hint, they all watch Oprah)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modernlunacy</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-15488</link>
		<dc:creator>modernlunacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 06:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/#comment-15488</guid>
		<description>I think the pants are interesting, but I&#039;m totally with you on the volume-on-volume thing. Layering volume on top of volume will only make your silhouette bulky a la The Teletubbies, even worse when the outfit is all one color, as above. 

If you are going to do volume, limit it to one voluminous &quot;drama&quot; piece, and keep the rest simple; it&#039;s chic because it not only emphasizes the drama piece but also because there aren&#039;t a pile of drama pieces competing with one another.

(Oh the drama.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the pants are interesting, but I&#8217;m totally with you on the volume-on-volume thing. Layering volume on top of volume will only make your silhouette bulky a la The Teletubbies, even worse when the outfit is all one color, as above. </p>
<p>If you are going to do volume, limit it to one voluminous &#8220;drama&#8221; piece, and keep the rest simple; it&#8217;s chic because it not only emphasizes the drama piece but also because there aren&#8217;t a pile of drama pieces competing with one another.</p>
<p>(Oh the drama.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg from The Bargain Queens &#38; All About Appearances</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-15426</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg from The Bargain Queens &#38; All About Appearances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 05:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/#comment-15426</guid>
		<description>I remember seeing that outfit on Oprah and thinking, &quot;Oh, no!  Lot&#039;s of people will be wearing that now!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember seeing that outfit on Oprah and thinking, &#8220;Oh, no!  Lot&#8217;s of people will be wearing that now!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-15390</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/#comment-15390</guid>
		<description>And I love your passion Maya! These pants aren&#039;t my cup of tea either. My intention was not to  condone the style, but rather to prove a point. For the most part, extra wide legged pants tend to look a little silly. For dramatic purposes they could work on someone very tall, but not in an unstructured knit such as these. 

In Nordstrom&#039;s defense, they post the outfit parts separately too. Have a look. You&#039;ll see that they already look better.  

http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/2966913?Category=&amp;Search=True&amp;SearchType=keywordsearch&amp;keyword=rachel+PAlly+in+All+Categories&amp;origin=searchresults</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I love your passion Maya! These pants aren&#8217;t my cup of tea either. My intention was not to  condone the style, but rather to prove a point. For the most part, extra wide legged pants tend to look a little silly. For dramatic purposes they could work on someone very tall, but not in an unstructured knit such as these. </p>
<p>In Nordstrom&#8217;s defense, they post the outfit parts separately too. Have a look. You&#8217;ll see that they already look better.  </p>
<p><a href="http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/2966913?Category=&amp;Search=True&amp;SearchType=keywordsearch&amp;keyword=rachel+PAlly+in+All+Categories&amp;origin=searchresults" rel="nofollow">http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/29.....rchresults</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maya</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-15389</link>
		<dc:creator>Maya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/#comment-15389</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with you Angie: I don&#039;t think those pants should be paired with ANYTHING. They look ridiculous. I like wideleg pants on taller ladies, but you would have to be about 9 feet tall before that much volume could work. They don&#039;t seem to fit anywhere. Wideleg pants look their best when they fit a bit more closely around the hip and thigh area. These look dumpy and comical in how exaggerated they are. I can see some potential in them as effortless floor sweepers, though.

Wow, you haven&#039;t posted anything so worthy of my scorn, other than perhaps those silly heelless shoes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with you Angie: I don&#8217;t think those pants should be paired with ANYTHING. They look ridiculous. I like wideleg pants on taller ladies, but you would have to be about 9 feet tall before that much volume could work. They don&#8217;t seem to fit anywhere. Wideleg pants look their best when they fit a bit more closely around the hip and thigh area. These look dumpy and comical in how exaggerated they are. I can see some potential in them as effortless floor sweepers, though.</p>
<p>Wow, you haven&#8217;t posted anything so worthy of my scorn, other than perhaps those silly heelless shoes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-15377</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/#comment-15377</guid>
		<description>Uggh! You are 100% right, it looks simply ghastly. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uggh! You are 100% right, it looks simply ghastly. <img src='http://youlookfab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meredith</title>
		<link>http://youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-15375</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.youlookfab.com/2008/03/21/volume-overload/#comment-15375</guid>
		<description>Oh dear, please turn down the volume on both of those outfits. I agree with you, Angie, that these evoke our dear friend Bozo. You add the pom poms, I&#039;ll add a pair of colorful crocs and we&#039;ll have the perfect clown ensemble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear, please turn down the volume on both of those outfits. I agree with you, Angie, that these evoke our dear friend Bozo. You add the pom poms, I&#8217;ll add a pair of colorful crocs and we&#8217;ll have the perfect clown ensemble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
